Court denies effort by state, county officials to weigh in on prairie dog lawsuit

This Aug. 2015 photo shows prairie dogs in Southern Utah. The U.S. District Court denied a motion by the State of Utah, Iron County and Garfield County to weigh in as amici curiae in a lawsuit over prairie dogs.

This Aug. 2015 photo shows prairie dogs in Southern Utah. The U.S. District Court denied a motion by the State of Utah, Iron County and Garfield County to weigh in as amici curiae in a lawsuit over prairie dogs. (Rick Bowmer, Associated Press via St. George News)


Save Story

Estimated read time: 1-2 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

CEDAR CITY — In April 2018, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published its 10-year General Conservation Plan for managing the threatened Utah prairie dog in residential and commercial development areas.

Animal-advocacy nonprofit Friends of Animals filed a lawsuit against the federal agency just a few months later, challenging the new plan and the permits it established for killing or translocating prairie dogs on private and state lands.

"Some of our major concerns with this new plan are that it doesn't offset the amount of prairie dogs that are going to be taken, it's extremely short sighted and it doesn't provide specific habitat that needs to be protected," said Jennifer Best, assistant legal director with the Friends of Animals Wildlife Law Program.

In the most recent development of the legal dispute, the U.S. District Court denied a motion by the State of Utah, Iron County and Garfield County to weigh in as amici curiae (legal Latin for "friends of the court").

The amicus brief filed by state and county officials would have allowed them to offer argument on funding for prairie dog protections and management practices on behalf of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. On Sept. 28, District Judge David Nuffer ultimately decided that the brief was untimely, prejudicial and of little use.

Friends of Animals celebrated the court's ruling, calling it a "modest win in an ongoing battle" and an important reminder of the numerous species facing extinction, according to a press release.

Read the full article at St. George News.

Related stories

Most recent Southern Utah stories

Related topics

Ammon Teare

    STAY IN THE KNOW

    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
    Newsletter Signup

    KSL Weather Forecast

    KSL Weather Forecast
    Play button