DOE: Nevada not an option for SC depleted uranium

DOE: Nevada not an option for SC depleted uranium

Save Story

Estimated read time: 3-4 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) -- Nevada has been ruled out as an alternative disposal site for low-level radioactive waste from South Carolina currently scheduled to come to Utah, a Department of Energy spokeswoman said Wednesday.

DOE spokeswoman Lauren Milone said nearly 15,000 drums of the material will either be disposed of in Utah or remain in South Carolina, and a final decision could come as early as next week.

She said the Nevada site about 65 miles north of Las Vegas is being excluded from discussions about the depleted uranium because the energy department agreed to conduct a statewide environmental impact statement before accepting new waste there. The review would take too long, probably at least a year, she said.

Disposal of the Savannah River Site waste is being funded through federal stimulus money, which is intended to quickly spur the economy.

The first shipments of depleted uranium were scheduled to leave South Carolina for Utah this month but the move was opposed by an environmental group and U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah.

Depleted uranium is different from other waste disposed at EnergySolutions Inc.'s facility 70 miles west of Salt Lake City because it becomes more radioactive over time, for up to 1 million years. The material is a by-product of the uranium enrichment process used to make nuclear weapons in the Cold War era.

EnergySolutions operates the country's largest and only privately owned low-level radioactive waste disposal site.

Utah's radiation control board is undergoing a rule-making process that would require EnergySolutions to prove it could safely dispose of the material before it accepts any more of the waste.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is also revising its rules for how depleted uranium should be disposed of, although that isn't expected to be completed until 2012 at the earliest.

In September, Matheson asked Energy Secretary Steven Chu to suspend shipments from the Savannah River site and to postpone any decisions on the disposal of waste from DOE sites in Portsmouth, Ohio, and Paducah, Ky., until the commission finalizes rules on disposal.

Recognizing opposition in Utah, the DOE gave a presentation to the Savannah River Site Citizens Advisory Board on Nov. 17 that said interrupted shipments to Utah would be diverted to Nevada. In the past fiscal year, more than 4,000 drums of depleted uranium were sent by truck from South Carolina to Nevada, according to the presentation.

Vanessa Pierce, executive director of the nuclear waste watchdog group Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah, said she fears the energy department may ship at least some of the depleted uranium to Utah before the Utah Radiation Control Board can finalize its rules to spend the stimulus money.

The original DOE schedule had the depleted uranium shipments to Utah completed by late spring.

"There's no health or safety reason to move this material at this time. Ultimately, it does need to be disposed of in an adequate facility, but let's wait and see what the rule-making process comes up with," Pierce said.

(Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

Most recent Utah stories

Related topics

Brock Vergakis writer


    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast