BYU study of 400M records says these groups are less likely to vote

Researchers from BYU and the University of Virginia analyzed 400 million voting records from elections in 2014 and 2016 and found large and persistent gaps in voter turnout by race, age and political affiliation.

Researchers from BYU and the University of Virginia analyzed 400 million voting records from elections in 2014 and 2016 and found large and persistent gaps in voter turnout by race, age and political affiliation. (Alyssa Dahneke, BYU)


Save Story
Leer en español

Estimated read time: 3-4 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

PROVO — Minority citizens, young people and those who support the Democratic Party are much less likely to vote than white citizens, older citizens and Republican Party supporters, a new study says.

Researchers at Brigham Young University and the University of Virginia analyzed 400 million voter records from the 2014 midterm election and 2016 presidential election and concluded that voter turnout is highly segregated by race, politics and age.

The turnout differences aren't just impacting elections; they're also shaping policy, said BYU political science professor Michael Barber, a co-author of the study. He pointed to age as the biggest difference, with older voters being two to three times more likely to vote.

"In some cases, the differences are really dramatic. That really has implications for policy," Barber told KSL.com. "We spend a lot of time discussing health care for old people and Medicare, retirement benefits for old people, Social Security and that sort of thing. We don't have nearly the same discussions about policies that would impact young people, and one of the reasons for that is that young people are just so much less likely to vote than older voters."

Barber and his co-author, University of Virginia public policy professor John Holbein, also found that those groups who are less likely to vote — namely people of color, young people and Democrats — are also more likely to live in areas where their neighbors are less likely to vote. The two researchers coined the phrase "turnout deserts" to describe these areas.

Much of the country has large pockets of these turnout deserts, according to the study. However, Utah had relatively few.

"As to why that is, we can't totally be sure. One possibility is that you do have a vote-by-mail system, so it is pretty easy to get and cast a ballot in Utah," Barber told KSL.com. "So, that could certainly be making a contribution to having relatively high turnout."

A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where Latino voters live. Latino individuals are more than four times more likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than white voters.
A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where Latino voters live. Latino individuals are more than four times more likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than white voters. (Photo: Michael Barber and John Holbein, PLOS One)
A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where Black voters live. Black individuals are more than three times more likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than white voters.
A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where Black voters live. Black individuals are more than three times more likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than white voters. (Photo: Michael Barber and John Holbein, PLOS One)
A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where Asian voters live. Asian individuals are 2.5 times more likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than white voters.
A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where Asian voters live. Asian individuals are 2.5 times more likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than white voters. (Photo: Michael Barber and John Holbein, PLOS One)
A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where white voters live. White individuals are less likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than voters of color.
A map shows the distribution of "turnout deserts" – precincts where turnout is one standard deviation lower than the national average – where white voters live. White individuals are less likely to live in a turnout desert precinct than voters of color. (Photo: Michael Barber and John Holbein, PLOS One)

Black, Hispanic and Asian individuals are three, four and 2.5 times more likely to live in a turnout desert than white individuals, respectively. Likewise, Democrats are 2.5 times more likely to live in a turnout desert than Republicans, and young people are 1.6 times more likely to live in a turnout desert than older citizens.

"Much of the country is segregated – especially by race and partisanship," Barber said in a BYU press release. "Minorities are more likely to live around other minorities who are also less likely to vote. The same is true of voters of both parties. These patterns can create a situation that results in persistent patterns of lower turnout in certain communities for a variety of reasons."

According to the research, in 2016 white Americans voted at a rate of between nine and 15 percentage points higher than Black, Asian and Hispanic Americans. The racial gap in voter turnout was even higher in 2014, during which white Americans voted at a rate of nine to 18 percentage points higher.

The study used voter file data from analytics firm the Data Trust and combined voter registration lists from all 50 states. The method differs from a majority of voter turnout studies, which tend to use survey data.

The researchers argued that the unprecedented access to such a large dataset gave them a leg up for two reasons. One, most surveys measure self-reported levels of voter turnout, making them susceptible to social desirability biases (where people respond in a way that will be viewed favorably by others rather than giving accurate answers). Two, surveys are rarely large enough to be representative at the local level, instead representing voters at the state or national level.

Barber said this will be the first of multiple studies based on the dataset. Future research will focus on digging deeper into the turnout deserts and how differences in how elections were administered, such as vote by mail, impact turnout.

Related stories

Most recent U.S. elections stories

Related topics

U.S. electionsUtah higher educationMulticultural UtahVoces de UtahUtah electionsPoliticsUtahUtah County
Sydnee Chapman Gonzalez is a reporter and recent Utah transplant. She works at the Utah Investigative Journalism Project and was previously at KSL.com and the Wenatchee World in Washington. Her reporting has focused on marginalized communities, homelessness and local government. She grew up in Arizona and has lived in various parts of Mexico. During her free time, she enjoys hiking, traveling, rock climbing and embroidery.

CONNECTED COMMUNITIES

Stay current on local Latino/Hispanic events, news and stories when you subscribe to the Voces de Utah newsletter.
By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

KSL Weather Forecast