This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.
SALT LAKE CITY — Following student criticism of Brigham Young University’s Honor Code Office, the school’s website now details the office’s entire investigation process and clarifies that Honor Code employees are “not therapists.”
The recent changes to the office’s website are in response to feedback received from students at the school after a viral Instagram account detailing students’ negative experiences with the Honor Code Office sparked outrage and protests.
BYU, a private university owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, requires students to sign a code of conduct if they choose to attend the school. The Honor Code asks students to live by certain standards, including abstaining from alcohol, drugs, premarital sex and following dress and grooming standards.
Those who do not abide by the school’s code of conduct may self-report or be reported by another student or faculty member to the Honor Code Office. The office will then investigate the situation and determine if sanctions should be meted against the offender.
Clarifying the investigation process
Many BYU students were concerned with the lack of transparency surrounding the investigation process. After listening to feedback from students, Honor Code Office director Kevin Utt announced that the office’s website would detail the entire process and clarify a few issues students say they weren’t sure about, including:
- Statement of good faith: Students will not be presumed in violation of the Honor Code unless they “either accept responsibility or the investigation process makes such a determination,” the website reads. This policy was already in practice beforehand, but the office now explicitly states it, BYU spokesman Todd Hollingshead told KSL.com.
- Support person: Students have the option to bring a friend, faculty or staff member to accompany them in meetings with the Honor Code Office. This policy was, again, already in practice beforehand, but not well-known among students. Now, the website details the process for students, Hollingshead said.
- Appeals process: “Students have a right to appeal their decision if they feel it was not reasonably supported by facts, the action was too harsh, the (Honor Code Office) was biased or new information is available that may change the findings,” the website reads. While this policy was in place beforehand, the process was not well-understood by students, Utt said. The website now details what students need to do to appeal a decision by the Honor Code Office.
One major change
While most processes detailed on the website simply clarify old policies that were unknown to students, Utt did announce one major change to the office’s practices.
Honor Code Office employees will now be called administrators, not counselors, “to reflect their role as student conduct professionals — and not therapists,” a news release from the school reads.
“When someone hears someone is a counselor, they assume they are licensed as a therapist,” Hollingshead said.
Honor Code Office employees are not licensed therapists, and the office wants to make sure there is no confusion with regards to their responsibilities. They can, however, refer students to the school’s Counseling and Psychological Services for mental health counseling if need be.
The office’s employees are now also required to undergo additional training with the Association for Student Conduct Administration — a national organization that develops and promotes best practices for universities. Employees were specifically trained on how to ask questions that are “sufficient and appropriate to the case and (that do) not go beyond the scope needed,” Utt said.
Many students had previously complained that the questions they were asked during an Honor Code investigation were inappropriate and unnecessary.
“I have taken seriously the charge to review each facet of Honor Code process,” Utt said in the news release. “The feedback from the students has been an essential component to this process, as it has provided a comprehensive perspective on the realities and perceptions of the Honor Code and the Honor Code Office.”
Students shouldn't expect the website to answer to all the complaints the office received, however. In May, a group called Restore Honor organized a protest against the Honor Code on school grounds and said they were hoping the office would change language they believe is discriminatory to LGBT students.
The group did not specify what language they saw as discriminatory or how they would have wanted it changed, and the website does not detail any similar changes.