Judge rules Trump illegally ordered National Guard to Portland, Oregon

A protestor at a rally at Mark O. Hatfield Federal Courthouse regarding President Donald Trump's plan to deploy National Guard members in Portland, in Portland, Ore., Oct. 3. A judge Friday ruled against Trump's deployment of troops to Portland.

A protestor at a rally at Mark O. Hatfield Federal Courthouse regarding President Donald Trump's plan to deploy National Guard members in Portland, in Portland, Ore., Oct. 3. A judge Friday ruled against Trump's deployment of troops to Portland. (John Rudoff, Reuters)


1 photo
Save Story

Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes

KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • A federal judge ruled President Donald Trump unlawfully deployed National Guard to Portland, Oregon, on Friday.
  • U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut stated no lawful basis existed for declaring a rebellion.
  • The ruling challenges Trump's military use in cities; an appeal is likely.

PORTLAND, Ore. — President Donald Trump unlawfully ordered National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, a federal judge ruled Friday, a legal setback to the administration's use of the military in American cities.

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut is the first to permanently block Trump's use of military force to quell protests against immigration authorities. Trump is also attempting to do that in Democrat-led Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington, D.C. It replaces her interim order that had prevented the Portland deployment.

Immergut, a Trump appointee, said the administration had no lawful basis to claim that there was a rebellion in Portland, or that the government was unable to enforce federal law due to the protests.

"The occasional interference to federal officers has been minimal, and there is no evidence that these small-scale protests have significantly impeded the execution of any immigration laws," she said in her 106-page opinion and order.

Trump's attempts to use military force to tamp down unrest are a sharp break with long-standing but rarely tested norms against deploying troops on U.S. soil.

The Trump administration is likely to appeal Friday's ruling, and the case could ultimately reach the Supreme Court.

The city of Portland and Oregon Attorney General's Office sued in September. They alleged the Trump administration was exaggerating occasional violence to justify sending in troops under a law permitting presidents to do so in cases of rebellion.

Dueling narratives emerged during a three-day bench trial.

Justice Department lawyers described a violent siege overwhelming federal agents, echoing Trump's description of the city as "war-ravaged." Lawyers for Oregon and Portland said violence has been rare, isolated and contained by local police.

Immergut concluded in her order that the violence was small-scale, isolated, disorganized and had largely subsided by the time Trump ordered in the National Guard in late September.

Democrats have said Trump is abusing military powers meant for genuine emergencies such as an invasion or an armed rebellion.

Immergut blocked Trump from deploying troops to Portland with an interim order on Oct. 5.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is considering the Trump administration's appeal of that decision.

Three judges, including Immergut, have issued preliminary rulings that Trump's National Guard deployments are not allowed under the emergency legal authority cited by his administration.

Photos

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Related stories

Most recent Politics stories

Related topics

Jack Queen and Dietrich Knauth

    STAY IN THE KNOW

    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
    Newsletter Signup

    KSL Weather Forecast

    KSL Weather Forecast
    Play button