US House looks to hike work requirements for food aid

Senior citizens receive a hot meal in Charleston, W.V., March 19. House lawmakers on Monday laid out a plan to increase work requirements for some recipients of a food program.

Senior citizens receive a hot meal in Charleston, W.V., March 19. House lawmakers on Monday laid out a plan to increase work requirements for some recipients of a food program. (Evelyn Hockstein, Reuters)


Save Story

Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes

KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • U.S. House proposes increasing work requirements for SNAP recipients, affecting millions.
  • The plan aims to save $230 billion, aligning with President Donald Trump's budget agenda.
  • Democrats and advocacy groups argue it reduces access; states may face new cost-sharing.

WASHINGTON — House lawmakers on Monday laid out a plan to increase work requirements for some recipients of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program food aid benefits and to eventually require states to share more of the cost of the program, according to the farm committee bill text.

The House Agriculture Committee proposal would also restrict future increases to the program's benefits that outpace inflation and would narrow the ability of states to waive work requirements during periods of high unemployment.

The proposal advances the committee's efforts to achieve $230 billion in savings, part of the Republican plan to pass a sweeping budget package in line with President Donald Trump's agenda.

House Democrats have warned that such an overhaul to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would shrink the chamber's possibilities for passing a farm spending package this year.

More than 41 million Americans receive benefits from SNAP, the nation's largest food aid program.

The farm committee plan would require adults up to age 64 without disabilities or dependent children to work 80 hours per month, hiking the existing age limit from 54.

It would also raise the qualifying age of the dependent children from six to seven.

Anti-hunger groups have argued that expanding work requirements would shrink the program's enrollment.

The Republican proposal "would take food away from millions of older adults and parents who are struggling to find steady work or get caught in red tape," said Ty Jones Cox, vice president for food assistance at the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

House Agriculture Committee chairman Glenn "GT" Thompson said in a statement that the approach would increase accountability and provide "a temporary helping hand while encouraging work."

The plan would also require states for the first time to share some cost of the benefits, which are currently paid by the federal government. The cost-share percentage would be determined by states' error rates in accurately distributing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits and would go into effect in 2028.

The country's 23 Democratic state governors said they oppose cost-sharing and that the plan would amount to a benefit cut.

"The notion that states will respond to massive cuts to federally appropriated dollars by backfilling with state resources is simply inaccurate and impossible," said the Democratic Governors Association in a statement.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Most recent Politics stories

Related topics

PoliticsU.S.
Leah Douglas
    KSL.com Beyond Business
    KSL.com Beyond Series

    KSL Weather Forecast

    KSL Weather Forecast
    Play button