Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes
This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.
SALT LAKE CITY — The move by the town of Hideout to annex 655 acres for commercial development over the objection of Summit County is dead after lawmakers on Thursday repealed a law that allowed cities to bypass surrounding counties’ permission.
“It did cause quite a bit of ruckus in my district,” said Sen. Ronald Winterton, R-Roosevelt, during a special session called largely to deal with the coronavirus pandemic. He added the issue may resurface in the 2021 legislative session.
“It’s something that we hadn’t anticipated, not knowing it was there. So I appreciate this effort and good faith. I think the process was flawed. So this will give us an opportunity to bring it back in the session if we want to fix it and have the input properly there,” Winterton said.
Summit County sued Hideout, in Wasatch County, to stop the annexation of land on the other side of the highway from Park City. Opponents say the move to annex was a result of sneaky legislative tactics that legally paved the way for a “land grab” for what would become another Kimball Junction-like expansion.
The county alleged a lobbyist for developers Nate Brockbank and Josh Romney, son of Sen. Mitt Romney, worked outside normal legislative processes to “bait and switch” a bill in March with “custom-made special purpose legislation” eliminating the county consent requirement and restricting the ability of a county to protest such an annexation.
The Senate sponsor, Sen. Kirk Cullimore, R-Draper, said when he carried the legislation last session, “it was represented to me at that time that all the stakeholders of the underlying bill were aware and had seen” a last-minute substitute. Four months later, Cullimore said, questions surfaced about whether there was a consensus and so he sought a repeal.
Hideout sought to annex the land for what it said is badly needed commercial development to employ future residents of the rapidly growing area.
The town may have been successful if not for a botched hearing via Zoom last week that prevented the required public meeting before moving the plan forward.
Rep. Calvin Musselman, R-West Haven, said the repeal was necessary given the urgency to fix issues related to annexation and the incorporation of cities. He, too, indicated a further legislative fix would be necessary next year.
“There are some issues as it pertains to property rights within the annexation and incorporation world,” he told his colleagues Thursday. “Hopefully we can dive into them and protect private property rights.”
