5 things small business owners should know about tax bills

1 photo
Save Story
Leer en español

Estimated read time: 5-6 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

NEW YORK (AP) — Small business owners are awaiting details of a reported Republican deal in principle on a tax overhaul, the details of which could come soon.

The deal, which would reconcile differences in the House and Senate versions of the tax bill, may answer the question of which business owners will pay lower taxes, and how much of a break they'll get. Both bills have raised the possibility that many owners, including professionals like accountants and consultants, wouldn't see a tax cut.

But gains were expected for companies like builders and manufacturers; both versions of the tax bill would raise the deduction that lets many kinds of equipment purchases be written off right away.

Top GOP aides said Wednesday the final House-Senate compromise is on track to be unveiled this week.

Before the news of a reported deal, lawmakers appeared in general agreement on some broad themes. Issues where there were significant differences included the tax rates for all types of companies and the size of deductions for equipment, property and interest charges. How much companies will pay in tax starting in 2018 will depend on fine points, technicalities and exemptions, tax experts say.

"The devil's always in the details and it's not there yet," says Edward Reitmeyer, a certified public accountant with Marcum LLP in Philadelphia.

Five things small business owners should know about the two versions of the legislation:


Perhaps the biggest consideration is over the tax rate for the vast majority of businesses — those that are sole proprietorships, partnerships and the companies structured for tax purposes as S corporations. These companies are called pass-throughs since revenue and expenses are accounted for on separate tax forms and then "passed through" to the owner's personal 1040 returns and are taxed at individual rates. They differ from most large, well-known businesses structured as C corporations, which pay their taxes at corporate rates.

The House version generally provides for the business income of the "pass-through" companies to be taxed at a maximum of 25 percent, compared to the current top personal income tax bracket of 39.6 percent. The Senate bill provides for 23 percent of a pass-through owner's business income to be tax-exempt, with the rest taxed at individual rates.

Both bills have limitations. Among them: Business owners who provide professional services, including lawyers, accountants and consultants, could see themselves at least partially excluded from the tax breaks aimed at helping pass-throughs. Some lawmakers view these professionals, particularly if they don't have employees, as high earners who shouldn't get the same breaks as owners of very small companies.

But it's questionable how many pass-through owners would see a change in their taxes, according to Joe Rosenberg, a tax researcher with the Urban Institute, a think tank based in Washington, D.C. He says 85 to 90 percent of pass-throughs are already taxed at a 25 percent rate or less.


As for the companies that pay their taxes at corporate rates, both bills set a 20 percent rate, down from the current 35 percent. The Senate bill, however, delays the implementation of the lower rate until 2019. C corporations include all of the Fortune 500 and other publicly traded companies. However, small businesses can also be C corporations.

Owners of pass-through companies who won't get any tax breaks might decide to change their business structure to a C corporation, Reitmeyer says.

"That is something that has to be looked at for everyone going forward," he says.


The deduction that lets companies write off many types of equipment purchases up front rather than depreciate them over a period of years would increase under both bills from its current level of $510,000.

The House version would raise the Section 179 deduction (named for a portion of the tax code) to $5 million, while the Senate bill raises it to $1 million. Companies most likely to benefit from the higher limits are those like construction, farming and manufacturing businesses that invest in large or expensive machinery and vehicles.

Depreciation rules that govern larger equipment and property purchases would also change. Currently, many investments in equipment or real estate must be depreciated over a period ranging from 2.5 years to decades, depending on what kind of property it is. Both bills allow for full up-front deductions of purchases each year for the next five years. The Senate version provides for a gradual phase-out of the full deduction over the following four years.

Both bills reduce the deductibility of business interest expenses to 30 percent of a company's taxable income. That may be an unwelcome change as under the current law, interest is completely deductible. The House version allows companies with up to $25 million in revenue to keep the full deduction. The Senate version ends the full deduction for companies with more than $15 million in revenue. Landlords, however, will be able to continue fully deducting their mortgage interest.


Another key area of dispute is whether to repeal the alternative minimum tax, or AMT. The tax requires high-earning individuals and corporations to compute their tax liability in two different ways and pay whichever amount is higher. Some Republican lawmakers said retaining it would limit companies' ability to take advantage of some tax credits, such as for research and development.

The Senate bill keeps the AMT for corporations. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., suggested this week that it's possible that the AMT will be repealed in the final tax bill.

Even if the AMT survives, some business owners may escape it in the future, Reitmeyer says, noting that the current bills call for an end to the individual deduction for state and local income taxes.

"The No. 1 item that puts our clients into the AMT is the state and local tax deduction," he says.


Both bills would simplify financial record-keeping for many small businesses that have inventory, making the cash method of accounting available to them.

Under cash accounting, a company records income when it's received and expenses when they're paid. Under the more complex method of accrual accounting, income and expenses are booked when they are owed, not when they're received or paid.

Generally, manufacturers and other companies that have inventory are required to use the accrual method, but current law exempts businesses with average annual revenue of $5 million or less. The House bill would raise that exemption to $25 million, while the Senate version would set it at $15 million.


Follow Joyce Rosenberg at www.twitter.com/JoyceMRosenberg. Her work can be found here: https://apnews.com/search/joyce%20rosenberg

Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Most recent Business stories

Related topics

Joyce M. Rosenberg


    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast