Writing error endangers South Dakota marijuana initiative

Save Story
Leer en Español

Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) — A writing error could cost a ballot measure campaign its chance to legalize recreational marijuana in South Dakota next year.

Cannabis advocacy group New Approach South Dakota has been collecting signatures for months in support of a proposed ballot measure meant to legalize small amounts of marijuana, the Argus Leader reported .

But the state's interpretation of the wording means it would only legalize marijuana paraphernalia, not the drug itself. Nonpartisan analysts with the Legislative Research Council said that one sentence in the 11-page proposal undermines the legalization effort.

The section legalizing marijuana paraphernalia addresses the law of "the state or the subdivision" (cities or counties), but the section legalizing marijuana itself only addresses the law of the subdivision and doesn't include "the state or."

This means the measure wouldn't affect the state's law banning recreational marijuana, should the measure make it to the ballot next year.

New Approach Director Melissa Mentele said she wrote the measure based on existing statute and that the problem can be fixed later by the courts or the Legislature.

"There is a fix for it, so I'm not concerned about it at all," Mentele said. "It's just a typo. It's one person's perception of grammar versus another's."

Legislative Research Council Director Jason Hancock said supporters of the measure could submit an amended proposal, but that would void all existing ballot measure signatures.

"They're going to have to start over for gathering signatures," he said.

A new proposal could derail efforts to get the question on the ballot as the attorney general's office could take up to 60 days to publish an explanation.

Jesse Kelley, an attorney with the Marijuana Policy Project helping Mentele's campaign, said that the measure was written to allow for local control in deciding how to implement the decriminalization of marijuana possession, sale and use. And the group has succeeded in states where similar measures have been challenged in court, she said.

"This is not a new issue that the South Dakota group is facing," she said. "Opponents will go to great lengths to defeat these proposals."

Kelley said her group will continue to work with Mentele to pass the proposal and amend it once approved.

Supporters would have to collect nearly 14,000 valid signatures by November in order to get the measure on the 2018 ballot.


This story has been corrected to show that the attorney general's office could take up to 60 days to publish an explanation, not 90 days.


Information from: Argus Leader, http://www.argusleader.com

Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Most recent Politics stories

Related topics

The Associated Press


    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast