Counties seek state's help with special election cost

Counties seek state's help with special election cost

(Derek Hatfield, Shutterstock)

Save Story
Leer en español

Estimated read time: 3-4 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

SALT LAKE CITY — County officials are asking the state to help cover the $1.5 million in primary and general election costs associated with filling the U.S. House seat in Utah's 3rd Congressional District.

State lawmakers, elections officials and a representative from the Utah Association of Counties discussed the cost expectations for the upcoming special election to replace Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, during a Wednesday meeting at the Capitol.

Running the special election simultaneously with municipal elections should keep the overall price tag down, officials said, but much of the costs will still fall on the counties.

"Money can be saved if you run multiple elections at the same time," said Justin Lee, deputy director of elections with the lieutenant governor's office. "We are saving quite a bit of money, but we're not saving all the money."

Municipalities can print ballots with both the 3rd District and local election options, and they could share polling staff and facilities, allowing for some cost savings, he said.

Despite sharing opportunities for local elections, only about half of the 54 municipalities included in the 3rd District will actually hold municipal elections that can run with the special election on Nov. 7, Lee said. Municipalities not holding local elections, as well as unincorporated areas, would pass on the special election costs to the counties, he said.

Additionally, the election website and database were only designed to run one election at a time, Lee said, and running overlapping elections would require "significant programming costs."

For municipalities where no more than one person is running for an open seat, the municipal election can be canceled, shifting cost of the special election to the counties.

We are saving quite a bit of money, but we're not saving all the money.

–Justin Lee, lieutenant governor's office

"The majority of this cost is going to come at the primary election, where we have a Republican primary election with the special election," said Arie Van De Graaff, with the Utah Association of Counties. "We have to cover the entirety of the 3rd District."

Van De Graff said counties anticipate saving more than $1 million by combining the special election with the municipal election, but Lee said counties are still anticipating a cost between $385,000 and $435,000 to cover races that are not combined with municipal elections.

"We have a responsibility to run this election. Obviously we don't want to pay for it," Van De Graaff said. "We thought about all maybe sleeping in cots in the offices to save that money, but that's not going to work for us, so any help from the state, we would appreciate."

Despite previous disputes between lawmakers and the governor's office over the special election process, lawmakers accepted little responsibility in resolving the problem of costs to the counties.

Senate Majority Leader Ralph Okerlund, R-Monroe, said because the Legislature was not involved in setting the election process, it would look to the governor's office to cover the cost.

"At this point, the counties would be on the hook for the tab," Lee replied. Email:

Related stories

Most recent Utah stories

Related topics

Ryan Morgan


    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast