Obama cites 'personal interest' in locking down Iran deal

Save Story

Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama says he has a personal stake on ensuring that negotiations with Iran produce an agreement that keeps Tehran from producing a nuclear weapon over the long-term.

He says in an interview with The Atlantic that if Iran has a nuclear weapon in 20 years he would be held accountable.

"Look, 20 years from now, I'm still going to be around, God willing. If Iran has a nuclear weapon, it's my name on this," he said. "I think it's fair to say that in addition to our profound national security interests, I have a personal interest in locking this down."

Critics of an agreement say the president is so determined to burnish his legacy that he will accept a less-than-ironclad commitment from Iran. The talks involve Iran, the U.S., four other permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and Germany — a group call the P-Five Plus One. Israel and some Persian Gulf allies worry that Iran may simply be delaying its ability to build a nuclear weapon in order to have economic sanctions against it lifted.

But Obama and his aides say his investment in the talks and a realization that it could in fact damage his legacy is why he will pursue a strong and enforceable agreement.

"He's not going to sign a bad deal precisely because it's his name that's on it," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Thursday when asked about Obama's response.

The Atlantic interview covered a range of Middle East issues, from U.S. Israel relations to Iran to the status of the fight against the Islamic State. The interview occurred before the takeover of the city of Palmyra by Islamic State militants, but after the city of Ramadi in Iraq fell to Islamic State fighters.

Obama called the loss of Ramadi a "source of concern," but added: "I don't think we're losing."

"There's no doubt there was a tactical setback, although Ramadi had been vulnerable for a very long time, primarily because these are not Iraqi security forces that we have trained or reinforced," he said.

Earnest, addressing the fall of Palmyra in Syria, said Thursday that the fight against Islamic State will take time.

"Until we're able to build up local forces on the ground in Syria who can take the fight to ISIL in their own country, you know, this is going to continue to be a difficult challenge, and one that is not going to be solved overnight," he said, using one of the acronyms for the militants.

He reiterated Obama's commitment to not placing U.S. combat troops on the ground to fight the militants and dismissed critics of Obama's strategy.

"There's a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here," he said.

Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Most recent U.S. stories

Related topics



    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast