Why police didn't search apartment earlier

Why police didn't search apartment earlier


Save Story

Estimated read time: Less than a minute

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

Tom Callan and Nicole Gonzales reportingKSL received your e-mails asking why the police didn't immediately search all the units at the apartment complex where they eventually found Hser Nay Moo.

The Fourth Amendment requires law enforcement to have a warrant or permission to go in. Police can't storm in without probable cause.

Paul Murphy of the Utah Attorney General's Office said, "They wanted to search every single home in that apartment complex, but they didn't have any suspicion about one particular apartment."

Attorney Greg Skordas said, "The Fourth Amendment would never allow the police to just go door to door in an entire facility and kick every single door to find a missing child, as horrible as the consequences are."

He says the police cannot just make all the apartments in a building an automatic crime scene when a child is missing.

"Obviously by the time they got that consent it was too late for the child," he said.

He says if a search is illegal, the evidence could be tossed out.

E-mail: tcallan@ksl.com

E-mail: ngonzales @ksl.com

Most recent Utah stories

Related topics

STAY IN THE KNOW

Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Notice.
Newsletter Signup

KSL Weather Forecast

KSL Weather Forecast
Play button