Estimated read time: 4-5 minutes
This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.
SALT LAKE CITY — Some of world's most recognizable brands and several Utah-based businesses have come out in support of the gay and lesbian couples challenging the state's ban on same-sex marriage.
Facebook, Starbucks, Levi Strauss and popular Salt Lake City eatery Tony Caputo's Market & Deli are among 46 companies that joined together in an amicus or friend-of-the-court brief filed Tuesday in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
"State laws and constitutions that deny marriage to gay and lesbian citizens are bad for our businesses," they say.
The companies argue that states like Utah that ban same-sex marriage causes them to differentiate among similarly situated employees in other places. "As a result, our ability to grow and maintain a diverse workplace is hampered, as is, in turn, our ability to grow and maintain our business," they wrote.
The brief is one of at least two dozen filed as of late Tuesday asking the appeals court to uphold U.S. District Judge Robert J. Shelby's ruling in December that struck down Utah's voter-approved definition of marriage as between a man and a woman.
Many of those organizations are based in Utah, including the advocacy groups Voices for Utah Children, Equality Utah and Alliance for a Better Utah, along with several religious denominations. A group of western Republicans, including two local GOP leaders, also weighed in on the case.
The briefs make a variety of arguments for same-sex marriage and families from historical, psychological, sociological and legal perspectives. They describe ways in which same-sex couples and their children are harmed by Utah's marriage law known as Amendment 3.
Last week, the plaintiffs in the case argued in a court brief that the law treats same-sex couples as "legal strangers" and denies them the rights and benefits married heterosexual couples enjoy. They say the purpose of the state's voter-approved constitutional amendment is to impose inequality on same-sex couples and their children.
Utah has until March 11 to reply. Oral arguments are scheduled for April 10 in Denver.
Alliance for a Better Utah
American Military Partner Association
Constitutional Law Scholars
American Sociological Association
Cato Institute and Constitutional Accountability Center
National Women's Law Center
15 states and Washington, D.C.
American Psychological Association
10 historians of anti-gay discrimination
Episcopal Diocese of Utah, religious organizations
Equality Utah and Utah Pride Center
Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders
Howard University School of Law Civil Rights Clinic
40 family law professors
Family Equality Council, Voices for Utah Children
Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund
ACLU of Utah
National Women's Law Center
Historians of Marriage
Family law and conflict of laws professors
Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom
In its appeal of Shelby's ruling, the state contends it has the constitutional authority to define marriage, and the union of a man and a woman is the best setting to bear and rear children. It also argues that traditional marriage furthers the state's interests in accommodating religious freedom and preserving social harmony in the state, while redefining marriage would be a recipe for social and religious strife.
Equality Utah and the Utah Pride Center wrote in an amicus brief that Amendment 3 has a more devastating impact on children of same-sex couples than the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
They say the law tells children, "Your parents are not really married," and, "One of your parents is not really your parent."
"Even more profoundly than DOMA, Amendment 3 ensures that children raised by same-sex couples will not be legally recognized as belonging to 'real' families —families entitled to equal respect and protection under the state’s laws," according to the brief.
Former Republican U.S. Sens. Alan Simpson of Wyoming and Nancy Kassebaum of Kansas were among 20 politicians who identified themselves "conservatives, moderates and libertarians who embrace the individual freedoms protected by our Constitution."
The group, including Salt Lake County Republican Party officials Melvin Nimer and John Storrs, says it has diverse political and social views, but embraces Ronald Reagan’s belief that the GOP must be a “big tent.”
They also share Barry Goldwater’s belief that "we don’t seek to lead anyone’s life for him. We only seek … to secure his rights."
A group of religious organizations, including the Episcopal Diocese of Utah and Mormons for Equality, argue that legalizing same-sex marriage would not impinge upon religious doctrine or practice.
"All religions would remain free — as they are today with 17 states and the District of Columbia permitting same-sex couples to marry — to define religious marriage in any way they choose," according to the brief.
In upholding Shelby's ruling, the 10th Circuit would ensure that civil law neither favors nor disfavors any particular religious viewpoint and leaves faith communities free to determine whether to add religious sanction to particular unions, they said.