Estimated read time: 5-6 minutes
This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.
RIO DE JANEIRO — Few spectacles have the power to inspire and unify people across geographic borders. Even fewer reach over half the world's population.
With the 2016 Summer Olympics underway in Rio de Janeiro, millions of spectators are watching the events unfold in person. The audience extends further still in the comfort of our homes: If the upward trend in viewership continues, Rio could surpass London 2012, which reached 4.8 billion viewers worldwide, according to the London 2012 Olympic Games Global Broadcast Report.
The Olympics' large scope comes with hefty costs. Using data from the Oxford University Saïd Business School, the team at PointAfter, a sports data visualization site powered by Graphiq, was able to compare cost and revenue metrics for Rio 2016 to previous Olympics.
According to data from the International Olympic Committee, most revenue can be attributed to broadcasting and host country sponsorships (which include corporate sponsorships of everything from operational and athlete training support, to advertising and promotional activities).
Following a similar trend to costs, Summer Olympics tend to bring in more broadcasting revenue than the winter variety (over double when comparing Vancouver 2010 to London 2012).
In the 32-year window between Moscow 1980 and London 2012, the number of countries and territories doubled.
Holding the exclusive rights to broadcast Olympic coverage is a coveted honor, with two-thirds of Americans tuning in for London 2012, according to the Huffington Post. NBCUniversal saw negative profit for three of the last five it broadcast.






