Pew Index Shows 40 States Improved Election Performance in 2012


Save Story
Leer en español

Estimated read time: 4-5 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

[STK]

[IN]

[SU] SVY STP

TO NATIONAL EDITORS:

Pew Index Shows 40 States Improved Election Performance in 2012

WASHINGTON, April 8, 2014 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Between 2008 and

2012, state election performance overall improved by 4.4 percentage

points, according to The Pew Charitable Trusts' latest Elections

Performance Index, released today. The expanded index makes it

possible for all 50 states and the District of Columbia to measure how

well they conducted elections compared not only with other states, but

also over time.

This annual study allows states to measure election administration by

looking at such indicators as wait times at polling locations,

availability of voting information tools online, rejection of voter

registrations, problems with registration or absentee ballots,

rejection of military and overseas ballots, voter turnout, and

accuracy of voting technology.

"We know common-sense solutions to improve elections exist. States are

pioneering innovations that make a real difference in the efficiency

and accuracy of their elections operations while also saving money,"

said David Becker, director of Pew's election initiatives project.

"The Election Performance Index allows policymakers to pinpoint what's

working while also identifying areas where improvement is needed."

Overall, 40 states and the district improved their scores in the 2012

election, compared with 2008. The scores of 21 states and the district

rose at a rate greater than the national average, 19 states' averages

improved but didn't keep pace with the national average, and 10

states' performance declined. The district improved the most-20

points-from 2008 to 2012 but still remained among the lower

performers.

Overall, Georgia showed the sharpest decline, dropping 7 points from

2008 to 2012. The state's voter turnout fell below the national

average, and the state had one of the largest increases in nonvoting

due to disability or illness. Georgia also did not add online voter

registration or post-election audits of voting equipment performance,

which many other states have implemented since 2008. Hawaii and

Vermont also had large drops in overall performance.

Other findings:

-- 13 states offered online voter registration in 2012, compared with

just two in 2008.

-- Wait times decreased, on average, about 3 minutes since 2008.

Florida had the longest wait and the largest increase in wait time in

2012-up 16.1 minutes from 2008 to 2012. Although both South Carolina

and Georgia had long wait times in 2012, they also had the largest

decreases, down 36.3 and 19.8 minutes, respectively.

-- 18 states and the district reported 100 percent complete data in

2012, compared with only seven in 2008. Improved data collection

allows analysts to more finely assess how well elections are run and

how to fine-tune them.

-- Overall voter turnout dropped 3.4 percentage points in 2012 from

2008. Turnout percentages in the Midwest and Northeast were higher

than in the South in 2012. Two Midwestern states-Minnesota and

Wisconsin-had the highest turnout rate in both 2008 and 2012.

-- Although the percentage of eligible voters casting ballots dropped

in 2012, compared with 2008, the rate of those deterred by illness or

disability or because of problems with registration or absentee

ballots also fell.

-- More states offered online voter information tools in 2012.

-- 30 states and the district required post-election audits of voting

equipment performance in 2012, compared with 22 in 2008. Mandating a

post-election audit allows states to ensure that voting equipment is

functioning properly and delivering an accurate result.

-- The highest-performing states-those in the top 25 percent-were

Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota,

Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Washington, and

Wisconsin.

-- The lowest performers-those in the bottom 25 percent-were Alabama,

Arkansas, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Mississippi, New York,

Oklahoma, Texas, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. Six of

these-Alabama, California, Mississippi, New York, Oklahoma, and West

Virginia-were also ranked at the bottom in 2008 and 2010, and

Mississippi was the lowest performer in all three years tracked.

Research shows that states offering more convenient opportunities for

voter registration had a lower rate of rejected registrations, lower

use of provisional ballots, and fewer voters unable to cast ballots

due to registration problems. Meanwhile states that utilized the

latest technology to conduct data matching of state voter registration

lists, such as the Electronic Registration Information Center, had a

reduced rate of provisional ballots cast and rejected and in

individuals who experienced registration problems.

A state's overall performance is calculated and averaged based on the

17 indicators that make up the index, each agreed upon by an expert

advisory group led by Charles Stewart III, professor of political

science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

This study draws upon quantifiable data for all 50 states and the

District of Columbia from the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population

Survey Voting and Registration Supplement, the Election Assistance

Commission's Election Administration and Voting Survey and its

Statutory Overview, state election division records, the Survey of the

Performance of American Elections, George Mason University's United

States Elections Project, and Pew's reports "Being Online Is Not

Enough" and "Being Online Is Still Not Enough." For the complete

methodology visit www.pewstates.org/epi.

The Pew Charitable Trusts is driven by the power of knowledge to solve

today's most challenging problems. Learn more at www.pewstates.org .

Stephanie Bosh, 202-540-6741, sbosh@pewtrusts.org

SOURCE The Pew Charitable Trusts

-0- 04/08/2014

/Web Site: http://www.pewstates.org

CO: The Pew Charitable Trusts

ST: District of Columbia

SU: SVY STP

PRN

-- DC00213 --

0000 04/08/2014 10:00:00 EDT http://www.prnewswire.com

Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Most recent U.S. stories

Related topics

U.S.
The Associated Press

    STAY IN THE KNOW

    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast