News  / 

Judges revise ruling, still side with school bathroom policy


Save Story

Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A federal appeals court denied a request Thursday for a full court to rehear a challenge to a Pennsylvania school district's policy allowing transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their sexual identity.

A three-judge panel of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled in May that the Boyertown School District, about 45 miles (72 kilometers) northeast of Philadelphia, could continue to allow transgender students the choice of what facilities to use. The students arguing against the policy said allowing transgender students to use the same facilities violated their right to privacy.

The 12 justices said Thursday that they supported the decision of the three-judge panel that the policy did not violate the students' right to privacy, but several justices argued the panel's opinion should not have delved into whether Title IX would constitutionally require the district to maintain its current policy. The three-judge panel vacated its previous decision and replaced it with an opinion that still discussed Title IX but toned down its reliance on the law for the opinion.

The students who filed the lawsuit with the help of the conservative group Alliance Defending Freedom have until Aug. 9 to ask for a full court rehearing on the revised panel opinion.

Four judges dissented, saying they would have granted a full panel rehearing because of the larger implications of the ruling and that they still believed the revised opinion incorrectly weighed in on Title IX issues as they related to transgender bathroom policies.

Ria Tabacco Mar, senior staff attorney with the ACLU who argued the case, said in a statement Thursday that the revised opinion— like the original opinion— sends a "powerful message" that school districts have an interest in protecting transgender students from discrimination and in promoting inclusion.

"Four judges said the court should not have addressed the separate question of whether Boyertown's practice is legally required by Title IX. But they agreed that Boyertown's local school board had the right to allow transgender students to use facilities that match their gender identity," she said.

An attempt to reach Alliance Defending Freedom after business hours Thursday was unsuccessful.

Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Most recent News stories

The Associated Press

    STAY IN THE KNOW

    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Notice.
    Newsletter Signup

    KSL Weather Forecast

    KSL Weather Forecast
    Play button