Tyler Robinson may learn today if he will stand trial for allegedly killing Charlie Kirk

Tyler Robinson, accused in the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, will be back in court on Tuesday to find out if he will be bound over for trial on the charge of aggravated murder, a capital offense.

Tyler Robinson, accused in the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, will be back in court on Tuesday to find out if he will be bound over for trial on the charge of aggravated murder, a capital offense. (Trent Nelson)


Save Story

Estimated read time: 4-5 minutes

KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Tyler Robinson may learn today if he'll stand trial for allegedly killing Charlie Kirk.
  • The Utah County Attorney's Office seeks the death penalty if Robinson is convicted.
  • Robinson's defense argues evidence is hearsay and questions DNA test reliability.

PROVO — Tyler Robinson could learn Tuesday whether he will stand trial for allegedly shooting and killing conservative political activist Charlie Kirk.

The preliminary hearing for Robinson is expected to conclude in 4th District Judge Tony Graf's courtroom with closing arguments.

Robinson, 23, is charged with seven crimes, the most serious being aggravated murder. Next week will mark one year since Kirk's death. He was killed on the campus of Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025, during one of his Turning Point USA rallies.

A preliminary hearing is held to determine whether there is sufficient probable cause to go to trial on the charges levied against a defendant. The Utah County Attorney's Office says it will seek the death penalty if Robinson is bound over and convicted of aggravated murder.

In July, prosecutors presented evidence during a week-long hearing that they believe ties Robinson to Kirk's assassination. The evidence included campus surveillance video, messages from Robinson himself claiming he shot Kirk, and a recorded interview with Robinson's roommate and lover, Lance Twiggs, who confirmed what Robinson told him about the crime.

Robinson's defense team called three forensic experts from the FBI and ATF to testify in an attempt to cast doubt on the reliability of DNA testing, arguing that test results are subjective. They also argued that much of the evidence presented by the state is hearsay and will be inadmissible at trial.

In addition, Robinson has been continuously opposed to live-streaming the preliminary hearing and pieces of evidence being photographed. Defense attorneys fear showing those items could taint a future jury pool and jeopardize their client's right to a fair trial, as they also point to the high level of interest the case has generated worldwide.

On Tuesday, the state and defense will each have two hours to present their closing arguments in Graf's courtroom. Following an hour-long break, Graf is expected to announce his decision regarding whether Robinson should be bound over for trial.

The day will begin, however, in a closed door session as the state, the defense and attorneys for the media debate whether a recent court filing by Robinson should remain redacted.

In their latest request to keep cameras out of the courtroom, Robinson's defense team filed a motion that includes a redacted paragraph. The public version of the motion includes several blacked out lines that come after the sentence, "Additional evidence of bias developing as a result of the widespread publication of this case can be tracked in real time."

Graf announced Monday he will hear the arguments regarding the motion behind closed doors.

"To prevent the sensitive identifiers and details from public exposure access to the unredacted versions of (Robinson's) oppositions shall remain restricted...until the court enters an order. Following the Sept. 1 closure hearing, the court will address the motion to classify and the pending electronic-media-coverage issues. The parties will then proceed with closing arguments on the preliminary examination, after which the court will make its probable-cause and bindover determinations," Graf stated in his order on Monday.

Over the weekend, Robinson's defense team also filed a "post-preliminary hearing status report" outlining the immense volume of evidence attorneys have received and need to review. The defense team has broken down the evidence into three categories: "Documentary, Forensic, and Miscellaneous Digital Evidence;" "Digital Evidence Requiring Specialized Processing and Analysis;" and "Forensic Discovery."

"While the defense has been diligently working its way through the disclosures, it is an inherently time-consuming process that is, in this instance, further complicated and slowed by a number of factors," the report states.

"The discovery produced in this matter includes a substantial volume of digital evidence that requires forensic processing before substantive review can be completed. Specifically, on March 13, the defense received a hard drive containing approximately 12.1 terabytes of digital forensic data, with 6,425 folders and 613,023 files. This production includes extractions of six mobile devices, fourteen forensic images of computer hard drives, and seven warrant returns or account records produced by third-party service providers."

This story will be updated. To be notified about updates, please click Follow This Story below on the KSL app.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Most recent Police & Courts stories

Related topics

Pat Reavy, KSLPat Reavy
Pat Reavy interned with KSL in 1989 and has been a full-time journalist for either KSL or Deseret News since 1991. For the past 25 years, he has worked primarily the cops-and-courts beat.
KSL.com Beyond Business
KSL.com Beyond Series

KSL Weather Forecast

KSL Weather Forecast
Play button