Estimated read time: 2-3 minutes
NEW YORK — The insurer that provided Donald Trump a $175 million bond in his New York civil fraud case will try to convince a state judge on Monday it is qualified and financially strong enough to issue the guarantee.
The bond issued by Knight Specialty Insurance is meant to secure Trump's compliance with a $454.2 million judgment won by state Attorney General Letitia James if he does not succeed in an appeal.
Justice Arthur Engoron imposed the penalty after finding that Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, fraudulently inflated his net worth and real estate assets to deceive banks and insurers into providing better terms.
James, a Democrat, challenged the bond this month, saying Knight lacked a "certificate of qualification." The state attorney general filed court papers on Friday questioning whether the bond is backed by secure assets.
Knight is owned by billionaire Trump supporter Don Hankey.
Engoron will consider James' objection at a civil court hearing in Manhattan, at the same time jurors down the street are expected to hear opening arguments in Trump's criminal hush money trial.
Knight has said it was authorized to issue the bond, which is fully backed by cash held in a Charles Schwab account pledged to the insurer, and that it could access nearly $2.2 billion of assets at its parent company if something went wrong.
James said in court papers that a Trump-owned trust still controls the account, and that Knight's own financial arrangements appear insufficient to cover the amount of the bond.
Hankey previously said in an interview that he charged Trump a low fee as he did not anticipate problems.
"We thought it would be an easy procedure that wouldn't involve other legal problems and it's not turning out that way," he said. "We probably didn't charge enough."
Hankey made his fortune in subprime car loans, with some regulators criticizing his companies' debt collection tactics. He is worth $7.4 billion, according to Forbes magazine.
Trump was originally required to obtain a guarantee for the entire verdict while he appeals, but a state appeals court let him post a smaller bond.
