News / Utah / 

Secret poll: State senators favor Liljenquist in U.S. Senate race

Secret poll: State senators favor Liljenquist in U.S. Senate race

Estimated read time: 1-2 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

SALT LAKE CITY — A secret poll of state senators found them favoring one of their former colleagues in the race for U.S. Senate.

Republican Dan Liljenquist came out on top in an informal poll conducted by the Office of the Legislative Auditor General. The former Bountiful senator garnered 11 votes; incumbent Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, received seven; and another former state senator, Democrat Scott Howell, got two.

The Utah Senate passed a resolution this year requiring the legislative auditor to poll the state's 29 senators to determine their preferred U.S. Senate candidate. Participation was voluntary.

Votes cast in Secret Utah Senator Poll
Of the 29 senators in the Utah State Senate, 20 cast ballots. The results are as follows:
  • Former state Sen. Dan Liljenquist: 11 votes
  • Incumbent Sen. Orrin Hatch: 7 votes
  • Former state Sen. Scott Howell: 2 votes

Sen. Casey Anderson, R-Cedar City, sponsored the measure, saying Utah's U.S. senators need to be more responsible to the Legislature. He lamented ratification of the 17th Amendment in 1913, which established direct election of U.S. senators by popular vote. Under original provisions in the Constitution, state legislatures elected U.S. senators.

The resolution initially failed in a committee meeting. But an amended version made it to the Senate floor where it passed 18-9, with Republicans and Democrats on both sides.

Twenty-six of the 29-member state Senate responded to the poll. In addition to the 20 who voted, six returned the ballots without voting and three did not respond.

Three senators who marked their ballots "I decline to participate" also offered unsolicited explanations as to why. Their reasons were:

  • Voted against the resolution in the Senate and do not want to participate now."
  • "Felt the poll should have been delayed until future elections."
  • "Concerned votes may become public if records not protected under GRAMA."

Related Stories

Dennis Romboy


    Catch up on the top news and features from, sent weekly.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast