News / 

Campaign Finance Reform

Estimated read time: 1-2 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

The brouhaha over a $13 million settlement to a losing construction team on the I-15 rebuild bid and its possible connection to large donations given Governor Gary Herbert reaffirms the need for campaign finance reform in Utah.

Did the winning construction team get the lucrative $1.7 billion project fair and square, and was it mere coincidence that one of the principals met twice with the governor and contributed some $50 thousand to the Herbert campaign during the time bids were being evaluated? Or did "pay for play" come into play? Was there a quid pro quo?

Governor Herbert and UDOT officials adamantly deny any wrong doing. For now, we'll take them at their word. At the same time we encourage the governor and all ambitious politicians to reevaluate a recommendation made last year by the Governor's Commission on Strengthening Democracy to establish a limit on campaign contributions.

The commission wrote: "We . . . recognize that campaign contributions facilitate speech. But we must also realize that money has the capacity to corrupt and to present the appearance of corruption. Our public discourse and civic engagement will never be sufficiently robust if ordinary citizens feel that they are priced out of the market."

The commission's recommendations for "meaningful" campaign finance reforms are outlined in its report. They are recommendations that should not be ignored.

Most recent News stories


Catch up on the top news and features from, sent weekly.
By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

KSL Weather Forecast