New laws mean changes for dogs owners, uninsured drivers, voters


3 photos
Save Story

Show 1 more video

Leer en español

Estimated read time: 4-5 minutes

This archived news story is available only for your personal, non-commercial use. Information in the story may be outdated or superseded by additional information. Reading or replaying the story in its archived form does not constitute a republication of the story.

SALT LAKE CITY — A new year means news laws in Utah. One involves dogs, the other drivers and a third regulates politicians — but these new laws affect us all.

No more dog discrimination

Of all the dogs in Utah, Pansy is one of the luckiest. She was given a second chance at life after being adopted from a shelter, and now, she can live in any Utah town her owner wants to.

Pansy is a pit bull.

Beginning Thursday, a new state law says dogs can no longer be discriminated against simply because of their breed.

"We believe all dogs are individuals and should be treated as such,” said Temma Martin, Pansy’s “person.”

Martin also works with Best Friends Animal Society, an animal group that worked with legislators to get this breed law passed.

North Salt Lake, Smithfield, South Jordan, Springville, Duchesne, Delta, Fillmore, Morgan, Honeyville and Garland all had dog breed bans and restrictions.

Now, those laws are no more.

"Responsible pet owners should be able to have any breed of dog they want,” said Martin, who believes pit bulls get a bad reputation. “They really do. Unfortunately, a lot of people who look at these dogs base their perception of them on the very, very tiny percentage of them that end up in the news for doing something bad.”

Uninsured vehicles to be towed

Another law that went into effect involves uninsured drivers.

In the past, Utah Highway Patrol troopers had the option to impound the vehicle of anybody who was driving without car insurance. Now, troopers are required to impound those cars unless there's a safety concern.

According to the Insurance Research Council, Utah has the fourth lowest rate of uninsured drivers in the country. But despite the relatively low rate, the sponsor of the new law, Sen. Lyle Hillyard, R-Logan, says the new law is "a worthwhile price for the greater good" of making sure uninsured drivers don't cause a financial burden to others if they get in an accident.


I think it sends a message out that we have a serious problem whenever anybody drives a car that's uninsured and hits someone. Those people have no recourse because there is no insurance available.

–Sen. Lyle Hillyard, R-Logan


“I think it sends a message out that we have a serious problem whenever anybody drives a car that's uninsured and hits someone. Those people have no recourse because there is no insurance available,” Hillyard said.

Several states allow impounding, but it's unclear if any others require it. Several cities in Texas, including Dallas, require police to tow the cars of uninsured drivers.

The law passed unanimously in Utah's state Senate in March, but only won approval by on a 38-31 vote in the House, with many Republicans voting against.

One of those opposed is Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clearfield, who said he's worried about the accuracy of the uninsured driver database. He's had several constituents complain that they were pulled over because the database incorrectly showed they were uninsured.

"These people, they had the proof. They were still cited. They still had to go to court," said Ray, who predicts there will be "a lot of unhappy people" now the law has taken effect. He's concerned about misunderstandings, such as a spouse or a child being pulled over despite not being the family member who pays the insurance.

"There's just a lot of "ifs," and I'm not sure it's the role of government to say, 'We're going to take your car and impound it if your insurance isn't paid on it,'" Ray said.

Utah's caucus system disrupted

A third new law taking effect Thursday involves overhauling the system to nominate political candidates.

Candidates can now bypass caucuses and conventions, and instead run in a primary election if they get enough signatures.

While the law is in effect now, the repercussions of it most likely won’t be felt until 2016 when many state candidates are up for re-election.

The Utah Republican Party has filed a lawsuit over the changes, arguing that the U.S. Constitution ensures political parties the right to choose how it selects its candidates. That case is still pending in federal court.

Contributing: Associated Press

Photos

Related stories

Most recent Utah stories

Related topics

UtahPolitics
Alex Cabrero

    STAY IN THE KNOW

    Get informative articles and interesting stories delivered to your inbox weekly. Subscribe to the KSL.com Trending 5.
    By subscribing, you acknowledge and agree to KSL.com's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    KSL Weather Forecast