Woods Cross residents voice frustrations with city, refinery
At a neighborhood meeting in Woods Cross Thursday night, residents decided to band together as one, figuring it will be easier to get answers to tough questions about Wednesday's refinery explosion that damaged their houses.
November 5th, 2009 @ 10:25pm
Sorry, we are not accepting new comments on this story.
144 messages
Community Comment Board
The messages posted here do not reflect the opinions or views of KSL or related entities. This service and the messages that are posted within the service are provided for public information purposes only. Read about the ksl.com comment guidlines here >>
While the refineries may have been there first, that doesn't give them any right to trespass upon or damage neighboring property. They should have either purchased anti-development easements over the property in harms way or purchased the property outright. They will be cutting big checks for this one. They are very lucky no-one was hurt.
@Bigdave196 - I don't get it. The refinery was there before houses were, and now they are complaining? They knew it was close by when they bought/built there.
There is a legal doctrine called coming to the nuisance. This is a classic example. You don't get to develop near a pig farm, then complain about the stink.
However, there is a competing theory that strict liability attaches for damages related to an abnormally dangerous activity. This industry certainly qualifies as an ADA, and thus they should be found strictly liable for the damages.
In the end, this is going to be one huge mess, most likely with many of the insurance companies paying claims then taking those subrogated rights against the refinery and the developer.
@Bigdave196 - First off. The buyers should have figured out that the refinery could be a hazard.
Second the sellers/developer should have disclosed that the housing project is in a "blast zone" I think that this is a material fact which could affect one's decision to buy in that neighborhood.
Third what greedy essohbee thought a blast zone would be a good place to put a community.
@Bigdave196 - Legal Eagle:
Coming to the nuisance is not the current state of American law. It is currently a small minority rule. See AMJUR NUISANCES § 426. Right to farm acts of course would not apply to a refinery. Also this was not a nuisance, so the basis for the coming to the nuisance defense would not fit the circumstances. Smoke, noise, and even risk levels from the refinery might be nuisances. Explosions which cause physical damage to neighboring property are not nuisances. Explosions would likely be considered akin to flooding and therefore trespass.
Either way I believe it will be a strict liability issue.
@Bigdave196 - Hello!!! Millions og gallons of gasoline! That tells me dont live close to that place! No matter what, accidents are going to happen! no matter how strict the safety code is! Do any of you remember when the space shuttle blew up? My point being, Why would anybody buy a house so close to a potential threat? Not to mention the smell of those refineries. The refineries are a necessary evil! you have no right to complain unless you ride a bicycle to get your groceries!
@Bigdave196 - Looks like the refinery has already determined that the outcome will not be favorable. The trib is reporting the refinery as having announced that they will pay for all damages.
@Bigdave196 - Woods Cross Citizens! Arise. You have seen and heard the Mayor act like Sgt Shultz of Hogans Hero's however, if his house was damaged, it would be a completely different scenario.
Yes the refinery was there first, but the fact remains that Woods Cross City wanted the money. When it caught up to them, they do the stupid routine.
Now they are going to display the big bully and go after the refinery for the blame. I hope that the rest of the citizens of this great city do not buy this manure that the mayor is trying to shovel.
Go after the City. Let the Mayor give up his home to one of us who's house was damaged. He won't. He is a coward. What a joke this city is............
@WoWsers - I agree, my brother and his wife have their house right there. When I saw where they were building their house, the first words out of my mouth were that I would never build my house that close to a refinery. I understand most of the blame is to be placed on the developer and whoever approved the building of homes there, but couldn't the people that bought the houses see that it wasn't a good idea?
Your scenarios are SIGNIFICANTLY different that what's being talked about. Building in the back yard of a refinery is not a smart choice. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that.
Smile, it makes people wonder what you've been up to! :)
As the investigation will inevitably uncover, the accident will have a root cause in poor maintainance or faulty safety procedures.
A good way to test an argument is to take the same logic and apply it to a different situation. My examples are different, but the logical argument is the same. If the logic doesn't bear out in both examples, you have a flawed argument.
No one on this board can honestly say that if Utah Power was negligent in maintaining a power line that damaged your home they would say, "Oh well, that's the risk I take." Puh-leeze!
You are no rocket scientist either. People who build next to a refinery should expect noise, pollution, and smells. Not explosions damaging thier homes.
Have you driven on I-15 past the refinery or taken Front Runner. Guess what, you were in a blast zone. Should peopel stop driving past it? I guess it is okay for the refinery to operate unsafely because they were there first (which is not true since there are homes in the area that are older than the refinery).
This refinery has 4 fires in 5 years and people should except that as okay? There seem to be a lot of dumb people posting on this story.
We got a few wars going on out there, folks standing up to the government corruption on the healthcare bill right now in Washinton D.C. but KSL covers a couple inconvienenced citizens with some cracked windows.
@mcspiffy - You really felt it in Clearfield? I live there and felt nothing. My husband works in Layton, which is a tiny bit closer and he didn't feel it either.
I'd rather be insulted by you, then someone I respect.
no it was your drunk neighbor actually running into your garage. He just left the scene before you could lift yourself off of the couch and lumber to the window.
@DJC 47 - Thats insane! The refineries were there first! i place the blame on the people who chose to live next to a bomb! Accidents happen. Maybe these people who chose to live out there ought to move and go buy a house next to a toxic waste dump or something so they can cry some more. im glad no one was hurt, but i dont feel sorry for them...
@DJC 47 - The problem is the people that bought these homes "assumed" that the houses were built according to safety guidelines and would be regulated by the city's planning & zoning dept.
But what they are not aware of is the "developers" are allowed to bring in "their own documentation" such as a letter from an engineer that says "it is acceptable" to build in these areas.
The city allows the permits, the houses are built, and then everyone is surprised when this happens.
@mcspiffy - I agree a big law suit is needed against the morons who bought homes right next to a gas (which tends to explode at times) refinery and now wants to cry about it. What has happened to personal responsibility in our decision making?
it's funny, I've heard all these reports about the property damage but not once have i seen KSL say anything about the actual people inside the plant! any deaths??
@Thomas d - No one was hurt at all. I'm three blocks away at an asphalt plant. I thought our plant blew it was so loud. We are on the West side away from the major blast force too. I was sick when I went outside of the office and saw all the smoke at SER. I am so thankful for no injuries. One man was knocked down at the plant but no injuries. Whew! We have employees that live in the subdivision that was damaged. One of their houses sustained damage from windows etc.
I have my own opinions about building in the blast zone but I am biased. I certainly do not blame any of the home owners for buying there. Why should they have worried if they were buying into a permitted housing development. I feel bad for all involved. One last time.....Thank Goodness no one was injured!!!!
I do feel bad for people who have dammage or loss, but I am having a real hard time thinking anyone is to blame other than those who built or bought houses by a gasoline refinery. Seems like the cry babys who don't like the noise of the airport they built their house by.
There is money to be made and I am sure the lawyers are patrolling the gutter. . er . .neighborhoods trying to get folks to sign up.
People weren't hurt, but gosh darnit, there is dirt and a broken window here and there . . no. . well, over there something looks broke. . but my point is, people need to pay for this.
SUE SUE SUE and then pass the costs to the consumer so refined products end up costing more, and we all end up paying for the idiots that built their homes to close to an oil refinery!
I work at silver eagle and I think I may have had something to do with this minor mishap.
I was drilling into an unmarked steel line when a lot of liquid and gas started running out, I wasn't sure exactly what to do so I sat down on the pipe and lit a cigarette to think and the next thing I know I am sitting in the parking lot...Sorry.
The people that live by the refinery should not complain. Who bought those homes? They did right? so who's fault is it for living that close to Silver eagle? look at all of the main points before you go saying lets sue Silver Eagle.
"I do feel bad for people who have dammage or loss, but I am having a real hard time thinking anyone is to blame other than those who built or bought houses by a gasoline refinery. Seems like the cry babys who don't like the noise of the airport they built their house by."
This is the dumbest reasoning I've ever heard. Thats like saying if an Airplane crash landed on your house, you must have been too close to the airport.
A.S. these homes in woods cross were built in a blast zone. The city knew it & so did the builders. The refinery is not at fault. They can not control what permits are given for home building. You comparing an airplane crashing into a house is not a valid comparison, since as far as I know, airports do not issue 'airplane crash zones' around airports.
@mcspiffy - The builders woulnd't get away with such bull-crap if 1- people didn't buy the houses. I'm betting the builders got a decent deal on the land and then the people that bought the homes and lots likely paid less than they would in other areas. This is similar to people who buy less desireable and cheaper lots by freeways, and then whine and complain about the noise until an expensive sound wall is constructed. 2- If the dim-whits in Woods Cross City hadn't given building permits for houses so close to the refinery.
Hummm... an explosion that damaged homes, breaking glass, knocking out windows... and was felt for miles and miles around and yet once again, a refinery 'accident' where none of the round the clock workers were injured or killed. I guess they all must have once again gotten the memo to vacate before this latest "accident". I wonder how much the insurance is for these things and how much Silver Eagle needed new equipment!
I live in Salt Lake and found a crack in my foundation, how do I contact the silver lake insurance adjusters? I'm pretty sure it wasn't there before the blast...
I agree with A.S. It is not reasonable to think that any business would pose a risk of death to it's neighbors. If there was that risk why did the city allow building permits? It was in fact an accident. Silver Eagle is liable not those who were affected.
@Chris M. - Are you serious? It is entirely reasonable by virtue of using little more than an ounce if that much) common sense to know that building houses within such close proximity to a business dealing in highly volatile chemicals would pose a risk of death to its neighbors. Herin lies the problem. What on earth were the homey buyers, the developers, and Woods Cross city thinking when they went forward with building these homes? You can bet that if the homes where there first, that homeowners would have raised holy he@$ to not have the refinery built. Undoubtedly the objection would have been over safety as well as decreased property values. On the flip side in this case, the people who bought homes in this area knew what they were getting into before they signed on the dotted line. At that point the value and price of their homes were greatly influenced (lower price) by the proximity to the refinery and the inherent dangers. None of this mattered since they got a good deal. Why is it that common sense only comes into play only after the developer and home owners have gotten a good deal? I remember when they were built and they are relatively new!
My wife told me there was a leak under the kitchen sink. So I said well go fix it then. So she opened the cabinet doors got down on her knees and bent over. That's when I noticed a crack in my house.
If the price of the home is the only qualifier in buying it, then you get what pay for.
Pretty and new homes for sure. But the developers couldn't have given me a home that close to a refinery for FREE! I settled for what the same amount of money would buy me in Cottonwood Heights.
I'm glad that no one was hurt. Especially with all of that flying glass. It would have been much worse in the early evening with everyone home from work and school.
"why did these idiots build next to the refinery?" That's like saying if a car veers off the road and hits your house, you only have yourself to blame because you're the one who built/bought the house that was right next to the road! Sorry, we can't all live on the bench! But that doesn't mean we don't deserve a little consideration.
The refineries have been haveing a lot of safety issues the last few years. Fires, and explosions. It is thier responsibility to run safe operations that are near the highways and also housing. Remember, these are the same refining companies that had to be sued for a decade and forced to install pollution control equipment in the late 70's. They do not care about the population of SLC whatsoever.
@saw1 - Let the peoples home owners insurance fix it... Thats like buying a house in a war zone and complaining that it got pasted with bullets... I guess im old school. What ever happened to being accountable? Build next to millions of gallons of gas? Gas is explosive! DUH!
when you buy your home, make sure you check the backyard for any refineries. Just a heads up. Alot of these nice neighborhoods are build in odd places these days.
All these houses are fairly new. Who is the knuckleheads at the zoning committee that thought building residential near a refinery was a good idea? Who in their right mind would buy a house next to a refinery. Hope they got a good price. The refinery has been there 60 years for crying out loud.
I wish that I could reply to some of these ridiculous comments. About the cry babies that built or bought homes by the refinery. I happen to be one of those cry baby idiots whose home is about 3 blocks from the home that was condemned. My home suffered minor damage compared to those closer.
Mine is not one of the newer homes so I did not build my house I bought my house. I have lived in my house for nine years. While I understand the risk of living near a refinery it is also expected that there will NOT be TWO reported incidents in less than 12 months.
Many commented on the board yesterday that there is more risk in driving a car than living next to a refinery. I agree with that comment. Now I drive to work 25 miles does this mean that I should quit my good job and find one closer that may not be in the same pay range because I am putting myself at risk by driving to work 25 miles each day? Me and the other drivers out on the road have a responsiblity to make safe decisions while on the road as do the refineries have a responsibility regardless of what surrounds them.
I don't necessarily agree that the refinery should be moved or shut down if they can make significant improvements to there safety to minimize the risk.
I am thankful that SE Refinery is taking responsibility of the damages caused to the residents affected.
When you post your comments on this board please be sensitive to those that are affected.
@Shaela K. - THEY WERE THERE LONG BEFORE YOU! AND WILL BE THERE LONG AFTER YOU! If i was you i would start packing my stuff, unless you just love that wonderful smell!
@Shaela K. - If you get your feelings hurt by what anyone on here has to say, then you really need to get a grip... Take this stuff with a grain of salt!
I walked outside and saw a crack in my driveway , I want to sue too! Oh , and also my car got some dirt on it and I need a new paint job , and also I felt the ground shake and it made me scuff my new shoes, I need new shoes now too ! I want to sue ! I need new stuff ! Any forms ?
Chris M and A.S. If either one of you were living in the area you would both feel very different. Go find where else to put people down.
With that said these homes have been built to close to the refinery. But this would have happen to the there people or others...meaning the house were going to be built regardless of who bought them. There just needs to be more safety put in place. I live in this neighborhood too.
I too feel bad for the people that have been damaged but very happy that no injuries (miricle). The developer who built the houses in the blast zone should come forward, the person that sold the property to the developer, the real estate agents, woodscross city & silver eagle if it's found they broke safety rules should all participate in the remedy. My opinion is the houses in the blast zones should be purchased and removed.
what should have happened is the city planning & zoning should have "denied" the building permits for these homes. The problem is the city allows the developer to bring in a letter from their own "engineer" that states "it is safe" to build the houses.
@slcgramps - MD, You are right and I would hope that the developer and the engineering firm have Errors & Omission Insurance to cover what is going to be a huge cost. Now that it has proven itself capable of happening, I wouldn't want any of my family living there regardless of how "safe" it could be made. This will be a very interesting case. As for someone else's comment that "Silver Eagle has proven liability" by providing insurance info the people should know this. Regardless of who's insurance helps these victims whether it's their homeowners, silver eagle or woods cross,developer's etc', once the findings are out and the trials are through with whichever enitity is responsible their insurances/assets will be attached for reimbursement. Silver Eagle in my opinion is doing the right thing by not waiting until this is decided. They want to help the victims period. We will see the true liable entity in time.
I have contented with friends and aquaintances that building in Bountiful or Woodscross or any of that area is insane. Why you would want a bench home up there, spend hundreds of thousands of dollars, even millions of dollars for a home that has a view of what? The refineries? Oh, I almost forgot the lake somewhere out there.
You can spend the money to live there if you wish. I would never live there because of the refinery, and because of the fault line that runs through there. That place puzzles me why people build there, and scares me in the fact they do live there. But if that area attracts you, feel free to spend and move in. Just don't say you aren't warned by the signs of what is there already.
Building in that area for scenery is about as dumb as building in North Layton for the quiet (note that all the fighter jets fly over all hours of the day and night there). Again, if you can see it, do you really want to live by it? Not for my nor my family
Gosh, I build or buy a house that has been next to a refinery and it is everybody elses fault. Hello....the refinery has been there for 60 years. They will take responsibility, but for pete sakes look around you when purchasing a house. Here come the trolls.
Residents knew the plants were there before the neighborhoods were. The powers that be should've never let homes be built within a mile or two of any potentially dangerous plant like these.
I really don't understand the mindset of some people. Sure, better precaution should have been taken when building/buying the homes, but there are risks to living anywhere. I look forward to see the reactions of those of you criticizing these homeowners when your pretty east bench home is damaged due to an earthquake. Maybe you should have taken into consideration that you are moving into an area sitting on a fault line? And every person living in California must be an idiot because they always have earthquakes. And people in Florida for moving where they get hurricanes. Stop being so quick to judge people.
All you idiots who think people should not be living there. The area was settled before the refineries were there. Many homes in the area are older. Although most of the neighborhoods are relatively new, some of the closest homes were there first.
By your logic, the refinery should not have been placed there with homes nearby.
In addition, if you think you are safe because you are out of the blast zone, you are kidding yourself. Do you not realize the toxic cloud from the explosion effected the whole valley. What about all the commuters on I-15 or Frontrunner that are in the balst zone? Should they not drive past the refinery because it is there?
I think the coty of Woods Cross should relocate every resident within a mile radius of the refineries. I think that Woods Cross city council members were wreckless and irresponsible to allow zoning for residential property so close to such dangerous property. The refineries were there long before the homes. This is another example of how money talks. I am sure if a company wanted to build a sex-offender halfway house next to a school and they had enough "lobby money", the property would be zoned. Methinks there needs to be some kind of auditing. This is not only a Woods Cross issue, every municipality is guilty of this "corruption".
What is sad is all the people so quick to screw over the refinery. This refinery was there long before most of these homes were built, especially the newer ones that received the most damage (everyone is in such a hurry to build, it's about quantity not quality). People who haven't taken care of their homes are now all of a sudden concerned with cracks and anything they can find to blame on the blast. There were homes that were obviously damaged and the refinery has always taken responsibility for damage due to these incidents. These people should be ashamed of themselves for lying and taking advantage of an ACCIDENT. Choosing to live close to a possible hazard is not anyone else's problem but their own.
kinda funny that owners are blaming the city for allowing building there? They where some least expensive new homes im sure at one time. How about the obvious problem homes in Sandy on widow maker?
I have lived in Woods Cross my whole life and that's where both of my parents were raised. It is a great city, i have always felt safe here. I don't remember once in my childhood, until 2005 when there was a fire,that there was ever a problem with the refinery. The surrounding areas can't help it when it catches on fire, or worse, explodes! I appreitiate that S.E. refinery is handling it the manner they are. nobody needs to be sued, things just need to be taken care of responsibly.
i feel for those whose houses were damaged. luckily my house, a block away, wasn't damaged as severely. i am greatful that nobody was hurt.
I think people need to play a little nicer. This affected real people. If this was happening to you or your neighbors, would you be writing these horrible things such as "idiots" and "crybababies"? The people were well informed that there was a functioning refinery there, but there was no past record of troubles until the past 5 years. I don't see why some of you think we didn't know it was there or the effects it could have on us.
@NYY - it wouldnt happen to me or my neighbors, we chose not to live by refineries, or on sliding mountains, or by airports, etc... one thing that schooling can not teach is common sense!
@NYY - Triple Teazer,
Where do you expect people to live then? No where is perfect! There are going to be problems where ever you go! You can't honestly tell me that where you live is perfectly safe, that there is no potential harmful problems what-so-ever in your community.
You can't anticipate your tire blowing up on the freeway causing a huge accident. We can't anticipate the refinery blowing up either!
My parents built in WX 43 years ago, a block and a half east of the SE refinery and in those 43 years there have been small incidents, but nothing like the last 5 years. We built a new home in the neighborhood just east of the refinery 6 years ago knowing that this refinery is there and that to date, the safety record was pretty good. I am sure I can speak for most of the residents in our neighborhood when I say; we DON'T want the refinery to move away. They employee our friends and neighbors. They bring a good tax base to the city which in turn keeps my taxes down. What we DO want is for the refinery to rebuild, to be safe, clean, and productive. This refinery is close to 50 years old. It makes one wonder how old some of the pipeing is, and is that part of the problems we are seeing. Is there a lack of true refinery knowledge employeeed there - hands on smart vs book smart?
Woods Cross is a GREAT community and there is no reason to think it can't and shouldn't be a safe one.
For those of you who call us "Idiots" for building here, it is a place and way of life we have chosen. Things could be worse...we could live on the flood plains of the Mississippi, or we could live in tornado alley, or we could live in California with the threat of earth quakes or large brush fires that destroy hundreds of homes each year. You all need to get off your high horses, and walk a mile in another mans shoes before spouting off.
There are inherant risks of living anywhere on this rock. Pick a place you love, call it home and pray for your neighbors and families safety.
I live in the so called blast zone, about 8 houses from the homes that were condemned. Everyone being critical of us homeowners claiming we are "sue happy" should get their facts straight as NO law suits have been filed. Everyone in my community has more than cooperated with Silver Eagles insurance and filing their own claims the way they have asked us to. We of course knew the refinery was here when we bought our home, but we assumed it was safe if the city allowed this development to be zoned residential. Show a little decency when you post here and have some respect for our friends who are now homeless as their houses have been deemed inhabitable. And just for the record, we love this community and think we live among some of the finest people.
@clowfam - And the astronauts aboard the space shuttle assumed it was safe when it blew up too... They knew the risks. Put yourself in a risky situation. And the odds are stacked against you.
I am sure the refinery will take care of the people with real problems, and also the crybabies with cracks and whatnot, Personal responsibility plays a big roll here, to be honest,most if the fringe home owners are grasping at straws to take advantage of the situation. The lawyers will be licking all the gutters here looking to line their pockets. Politicians as well as home owners and most public employees know nothing of these things they will make their opinions look as good as they can but will only worsen out lives, things happen no one is guaranteed an upset free existence, whining to the news media (who will sound bite it to death) in the end won't do any thing but make it worse they don't know news from an empty post hole. what a refreshing thing it would be to deal honestly with the refinery.Not lawyers or public employees.
I have waited to respond on here and debated to say anything at all but a few comments on here are just wrong even if intended to be funny.
First off the comment on smoking and drilling into the line is ignornance at its best. This is not a funny situation.
Second, why are there no comments on why the city has allowed homes to be built so close to this refinery? In my mind the city is as more at fault than the developer. If the zoning change wasn't approved by the city the homes would never have been built.
Third, the refinery will pay for the damage to homes and thank God no one got hurt or killed, but I do not feel sorry for people who buy next to something that could have problems. This is like those people that buy next to the airport and complain about the noise or next to a golf course and complain about their house getting hit by a golf ball.
Next, I love the speculation, no one knows exactly what happened yet except there was a leak of hydrogen and diesel fuel. So far the heat source that was needed to finalize this has not even been found yet.
The only major issue I see is that everyone is okay. Homes can be replaced but people can't.
It's like the people that build these big homes by the freeway and then complaign about the road noise, or the people that build a home next to a dairy farm and want the farmer to move because it stinks so much! Come on people, you decided to build/buy there!
@Kenny B. - Um, not exactly. Those things are part of normal operations. You wouldn't expect planes to be dropping out of the sky or livestock stampedes every 6 to 8 months.
It is nothing like the people who build next to a freeway or farm. You expect noise when you build next to a freeway, not to have your house destroyed by the freeway blowing up. You expect the smell from a farm, not your house being destroyed by cows blowing up.
Your analogies are the stupidest I have seen yet. People who build next to a refinery expect the smell, noise, and pollution. They don't expect a legitment regulated business to blow up a couple times a year and damage homes.
If you built next to a bakery would you expect it catch fire and burn your house down? After all you would have known the bakery was there and had a oven.
THE CITY HAD A REPORT FROM THE DEVELOPERS ENGINEERING FIRM THAT SAID THIS LAND IS SAFE TO BUILD ON.
This corruption between developers and city's looking to unload land is one reason developers should be required to purchase at least a 30 or 40 year bond so if something like this happens the "Honorable Home Owner" is not "screwed" but gets their home fixed ASAP cause that bond is a legally binding contract.
We have so much development where i live commissioners are already talking about requiring such a bond to prevent another Promontory where many contractors got "screwed" out of "ALLOT" of money. Developers present the most fabulous idea ever it will better your community is usually the sales pitch "HOWEVER" once they have built and sold those homes off to a finance company they take the money and run just like a SCUM BAG who can not live up to a "legally binding contract". There needs to be responsibility put on the developer after a development is finished so crap like this does not happen. Another example of lousy development is four corners canyon. If those developers were required to fix anything or build a new home whose concrete was moving i guarantee you half those homes would not be there. Just my opinion but the trend continues cities in Utah screw the "Honorable Public" over once again. By the way where was the city's engineer on this one golfing at the expense of "Honorable Tax Payer Money On Honorable Tax Payer time"???
It is sad what has happened to people's homes, thank goodness no one was injured or killed. But I do believe that a majority of the responsibility lies on the developers and those who bought their homes from these developers. I would imagine the builders lied when asked about issues, and the bottom line is money.
I don't think it would be fair to sue the refinery though, as this was labeled a "blast zone". City, yes, developers, yes, and the residents should use their homeowners policies. We built our home with a big hill/small bluff behind our house. We know that a fire might get to our home, or that if the hill was dug into we could have mudslides, but we checked out these issues and felt satisfied that it was within our risk level. Our bluff is solid granite, and there are now homes between ours and the brush.
Also, we have earthquake insurance, which I hope to never have to use, but we have it. People need to check things out before they put themselves and their families at more risk than necessary. This is a lesson learned for many.
@Cathy C. - cathy i understand what you are trying to say.. but your comment is flawed. an earthquake or fire are natural causes, whereas a gas line exploding at a refinery is not. two completely different scenarios.. man made and nature
Just one comment to some individuals and their comments,do you believe in god,if so,please have some moral and caracter and stop,dang stop making fun of these poor people who bought home and had a garantees from those developers ,who needs to be sued badly for their malfunction and false reports of so called"safe zone".Refinery should not be placed in this close to SLC downtown area in first place.Who made plans for refinery in 2 miles from dowton SLC is likely Rocky and also this guy Woods Cross Mayor.I think he WC mayor should be caracter if he resignes immediately from position,because he failed on decision 100%,even plus he let developers to build that houses there.Again,you all who is laughing and making idiotic jokes on poor folks who just lost homes,because each of those homes is likely 500k if not more.How would feel if that happened to you,haaaaa!Refinery needs to be relocated asap and that should be job for governor to make them go out of there.Jail time for golden eagle managemnt and president and license away,because even that last explosion report has not been delivered to WC mayor,then this hapenned.Refineries in the middle of SLC ,almost downtown,thats insane decision for any mayor to make,even Rocky,enviromentalist Anderson.Becker please stop them in distroying SLC.
@ryderforever - Whey do all of you guys bring God into play here. That i something i will probably never understand. God and any religion has nothing to do with SE blowing up so lay off of it for pete sake, its just a default excuse for everyting. Also for the people's homes who got damaged, JUST TAKE CARE OF IT AND QUIT CRYING ABOUT IT, just give it sometime and everything will be taken care of adequately. oh and by the way you might just wanna find a differnt city to live in.
i never write on these boards but this is so sad.. i read comments from people not only about this situation but things that are happening to people every place there are some of you people that i feel sorry for the ignorence you go out of your why to put on these boards is sick.. and the person that said about sitting on the pipe and smoking wow...some day some will happen to you or a child in your family and if it is on ksl and someone like your self goes on there and post something as hateful and ignorent as what you and many other have posted has hateful as you and people like you are i will be the first one to attack anyone that post a hateful and cruel comment about your saddness ..wow people are we really this pathetic that we post things like this every time somrthing bad happens to another human being i feel sorry for peopl and im sorry for using the person that said the sitting and smoking comment but wow it scare me to know people are really like that..i am sorry.
go ahead im sure someone is just waiting to attack me for this comment and for my spelling what a sad thing to see..would you make fun of the kids born in third world countrys that didnt have a choice on who there parents were going to be wow i not only feel sorry for the ones that write these sad comments but for all of us this is are world these are the people that are ..our freinds and family..neigbores brothers ..sisters ..ya i feel sorry for all of us.. go ahead people let me have it ..it wont change anything have a good time making fun of people in bad sistuations .you will suffer something in your life to we all do every one of us will remember this post you wrote remember.....remember....
To ALL of the blame somebody slobs,
you folks are IDIOTS!
Homeowners are pretty much not to blame.
Most people are not continual purchasers of homes, are they? They assume that everyone has gone through the process. Who of you checked for surrounding saftey problems? I did, Autoliv is about 6 blocks from my house. But I also assume they have the proper permits to be inside of Brigham City.
Land owners?
Developers?
Realty?
The refinery owners?
Land Owners have mostly been rubber shoe wearin', wellfare burden taken, got to use my kids like India, hard workin', cow milkin', people. They sold out to developers because they had no money because of others saying "THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE MONEY". Developers want to sell their area and make money. Realtors need to make money, that is their job.
Small refiners buy just enough land to do their business. Big refiners plan ahead for expansion. I my experience in this feild, I have NEVER seen a refinery without a Buffer Zone........ But then this is Utah. Who said this guy could build a plant that could have problems in the near future in this locale? Who has changed city ordinances to allow people to move here? Chase the money and you find alot of small time, short term gainers.
The Oil Industry is not this big huge monster that wants to be the god of this world. OK,,,,, that's not true but,,,,, without our consumption they are nothing. That is the POWER of consumerism. I buy, someone supply.
To me short term gainers are those that consider themselves MOVERS & SHACKERS. You people elect the low sallaried folks of government yet expect them to be christ like. Of course this is not South America or Indo-China, but, a few trips to Lake Havasu would swing alot of hips in a small town in Utah. Just to say that you know "SO & SO GABILLIONARE" is enough to get most of you.
Just the smell of money, the faint whiff,,, of a fart,,, of a cent (Yeah,,,, a play on words, pretty good wasn't it?) makes you all,,,,,, including myself,,,,,,,, "Garden variety" hoes, I this world of money.
Money makes the evil giants live. If they are evil, fix it,,,,,, don't whine.
Who of you would complain if you were in their shoes?
I think you all are the next "LOVE CANAL" or "TIMES BEACH". Sucked in by, buy low, sell HIGH!
The developers engineering firm report....that should be the first clue. Do you think for one minuet that their firm would give them anything but what they wanted to hear. The firm chosen should have been an independent one not one of their choosing.
C'mon folks. You didn't know about a "blast zone" when moving close to a GAS/OIL refinery? Ummm...here's a news flash, every day when you start your vehicle there's a controled explosion that takes place in your engine. It's the result of that refined gas being pumped into the cylinder of the engine and exploding. How could you say you didn't realize there could be a danger of something exploding at a refinery and a resulting blast zone? Are you that addicted to Nintendo that you have no concept of common sense?
Side note, one of the bigger refineries (like Chevron) having one of their boilers blow up could take out an area reaching from the south end of Farmington down into North Salt Lake.
@Roscomann - Agree but some moron or group of morons (never underestimate the power of stupid people in groups) thought allowing the deveopment land in the blast zone was a good idea. Kudo's to Chevron for NOT telling developers to shove off when they offered to buy land around thier blast zone.
I know the there will be lawsuits but I think the blame should be on Woods Cross City and the developers who put greed over safety.
Hard to believe hu? Refineries are needed. They have been there over 100 years. You build your houses too close, AND NOW YOU COMPLAINE ABOUT THEM. THIS IS JUST STUPID.
LIKE THE GUY WHO BUILT HIS HOUSE CLOSE TO THE AIRPORT, THEN COMPLAINED ABOUT THE NOISE OF THE PLANES.
WHO THE "L" IS BUILDING THESE HOUSES THAT CLOSE TO REFINERIES? YOU PEOPLE SHOULD BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DAMAGES...ALONE !
DO YOU KNOW THAT IN 2006 A STUDY IN BOSTON UNIVERSITY ABOUT THE HIGH RATE OF CANCER IN BOUNTIFUL FOUND THAT IN DAVIS COUNTY , CANCER RELATED DEATHS WAS 2.123 X HIGHER THAN SALT LAKE COUNTY. THIS REPORT WAS NEVER RELEASED. IT WAS SNUFFED IN UTAH ! THEY DIDN'T WANT AN EXODUS FROM DAVIS COUNTY. MY SON WAS ATTENDING HARVARD AND SENT ME THE MAGAZINE ARTICLE.
I am sorry for the property damage but you whiners need to remember where you live and banners you usually wave until something happens to you. YOu live in Utah which is a very pro property rights state. You want the right to do what every you want with your property. But you complain like heck when your neighbor wants to do what they want with their property. Developers and Realtors have a lot of powerful lobbiest whom every year are trying to make it harder for municipalities to control land uses. You pro property people come unglued when the city, municipality or state writes ordinances or laws for tighter control on land use decisions. If you are the farmer wanting to develope your fields, you want to build a smaller lot subdivision to maximize you profit. Whne you are the new home buyer in phase one of the subdivision you are thrilled that your new house is on a dead end street with undeveloped farm land on your side, but then you complain when phase two goes in and your street is continud and the field next door is now more houses. You want to live in a private lane exclusive neighborhood but then complain that the city wont plow or resurface your privated road and your HOA can't afford to maintain all of your subdivisions open space. You tell the city that you are tax payers too and you deserve your streets plowed and maintained just like all the common folks. And then when the city tries to help you complain that your taxes are growing up. Hey Woods Cross residents you were able to buy a bigger starter castle because lots are cheeper next to the railroad tracks and refineries. So shut up and deal with your decision to buy a house in Woods Cross. Hey trains come off their tracks sometime
@carnivorous - Some cities care where you want to build butmany state codes make it near impossible to stop development. If Utah had more restrictive codes like say Oregon you conservatives would be freakin out about how socialist the government is. It may be hard for you to believe but with the current tax structure residential doesn't pay. commercial and retail does that is why all of these once smaller cities like Centerville, American Fork, Pleasant Grove, NSL and Springville have gone after big box retail. it pays the bills
It seems to me that the refinery would not have given blessings for the developers to build in the blast. What would they have gained? More likely they documented their fears to the city. I think the developers, their engineering firm, Woods Cross City are the culpable parties here. I heard a rumor (it's just a rumor) that one of the city councilmen was the original property owner. If true I'll bet his home in not in the blast zone.
I don't think the homeowners are at fault at all. Who would suspect that an approved subdivision would be allowed in a blast zone. The guilty parties should be mandated to buy all of the homes in the blast zone (at the highest appraised rate since being built) and relocate everyone out of the blast zone. End of story.
What's all the compaining about? A few explosions never hurt anyone. If you don't like Woods Cross, move to New Orleans and deal with a few hurricanes. Or, you could move near HAFB and just deal with a few fuel tanks and 500 lb bombs being dropped near by.
@SLCSkier - I live nearby and no I didn't expect "ocean breezes". I expected all the smells and noise from the trains...because I LOOKED AROUND. I'm not suing anybody either because crap happens. If your ski lift falls to the ground one trip, remember, you're the "idiot" who got on the thing, what did you expect?
@SLCSkier - Less than a half mile away? Try 175 feet. Most of you on this board would be in shock if you saw how close these houses are to the refinery units. The refinery office looks to be 3 times farther away from the units than these houses are...it's the whole blast zone idea. It keeps rearing it's head, doesn't it?
I am sorry that this has happened to these people. I think they need to do a major inspection of the refinery. Something is wrong when this starts happening more often. I wouldn't have bought a house by the refinery, but things can happen to anyone. A jet from Hill Air Force Base could accidentally drop a bomb in my neighborhood, or we could have an earthquake, any number of things so I don't think the owners of these homes should be calld "whiners." If something like that happened to my home no matter where I lived I would expect the responsible parties to pay for it. Place blame on the greedy developers.
To all the people basically saying “That’s what they get for living next to a refinery!” you are a bunch of ignorant self absorbed tools. Last time I checked explosions were not standard operations for refineries. Comparing this incident to complaining about noise from the airport or a train is irrelevant. If people were complaining about the smell then I would say that those are relevant comparisons. This would compare to a plane crashing on a house because it could not make it to the runway or a train derailing and crashing into houses. You judgmental holier than thou people need to be a little more compassionate for your fellow people. Now I hope the refinery takes care of the problems and I also hope that no one gets greedy and tries to sue them.
I do feel bad for the people who have damaged houses. But they didn't know they were in a blast zone? I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to figure that a refinery can go boom, and make a big boom. I was in NSL last year when they did the evacuations because of that plant. They after all did evacuate woods cross, and even my neighbor in Foxborro got a call to evacuate. They evacuate you because your in a blast zone. If you move in next to a potential bomb, you may get blown up. Just my two cents. Not really trying to be an @s, I do think the refinery should replace all of the damages.
These comments have turned ugly...no constructive ideas. I live nearby, I'm not suing. I live there because I am surrounded by great people. I knew the SE was there when I purchased. Take the good with the bad. if this incident was becasue of neglect, fix it. if it was a "perfect storm" event, learn from it and drive on. I also don't care for the "you're an idiot for living in WX" schtick...it's cliche and been applied to everything from liquor laws, religion, and even college sports teams and demonstrates a lack of depth. We all live in a major earthquake zone too. Aren't we all fools for living in the SL valley?
woods cross accepted a study saying it was safe but after that concussion I agree with these ksl excerpts from posters.
****I live in North Salt Lake and it felt like something huge had landed on our roof, but the electricity when out right as the concussion hit. We at first didn't know what had happen, but we looked out our back window and saw the plumes of black and white smoke. My husband guessed it was Silver Refinery. Few minutes later heard on KSL that it was the Silver Refinery. But it felt like something landed on our house roof.
****I thought it was a sonic boom when it happened. Our whole house rocked and the windows bowed. We are way up on the bench. Wow!
***I lived in Elk Grove CA where an asphalt plant had 3 explosions in 2 years. The local fire department shut it down until it fixed the problem and had a safety plan in place to prevent further problems. The fixes and the plan had to be OKd by some safety company in TX before the fire dept would allow it to reopen. Why is this refinery allowed to just carry on business as usual? Is there no union there? No safety watchguards? What about the local towns? Can't they get together and make demands re a thorough overhaul of this company's safety procedures? I am just amazed that the people who live in the towns around this refinery just shrug off these explosions and don't do anything about them. You CAN demand a new safety procedure plan be implemented. You CAN get outside experts in the refinery industry to review the safety procedure plan and make recommendations. You CAN dictate how often inspections are done and who does them. It's YOUR lives,YOUR homes that are in danger!!
***When I worked for a home builder, I would often see diagrams of concentric circles surrounding places like this refinery, Kennecott, Hill Air Force Base and other volatile places. The circles represented the kill zones if one of these places was attacked or ever exploded. The first circle, usually right around the facility and about 10 blocks out, was the immediate kill zone with 100% fatality. Every circle outward had a certain percentage of deaths, amount of destruction and so on. I would sometimes stand there, in awe, of which subdivisions were allowed to build within the first three circles.
Does anyone know what time this happened? Was it around 9:15 in the morning? If that is the time I felt this at my house in S. Ogden! I thought it had to do with the excersise at Hill AFB. My living room window shook!
Seriously, You people have no common sense at all. I think all that Wasatch front pollution has caused some severe brain damage that effects your common sense.
Residents raise questions about safety ?
"How did the city decide it was safe to zone for residential use?" resident Adam Evarts asked.
questions about safety ? Then why did You move next door to an oil refinery?
Don’t go after the refinery ! Who is the STUPID one for moving there?
Would You people build a house next to a company that makes nitro ?
well there could be a bigger explosion at the kennecott smelter, the furnace's maxium is 180 tons per hour and they force 230 tons per hour in them which put the lives of the people who work there in danger, also it puts to much strain on all the other parts of the facility that the whole mountain can blow and then you could have many lives in magna lost,the foreign people who own kennecott rio tinto don't care about american lives they care about the money and they use part of that money to brainwash the utah people...............
MOVE! What did you think was going to happen if and when an accident happend? DUH! The refinery should not have to do anything it is you homeowners that are at fault your the ones that moved in or built there, again DUH! It was an accident, these things just happen sometimes!
I am a WX resident and my house is built near the refinery. I have a copy of the Redd Engineering study in my possession. Email me if you would like a copy of the report @ c3479@aol.com. All residents that live just east of the refinery NEED to read this report. Not only does the report use a methodology that is scientifically sound and accepted universally in the industry, but it is prepared by an engineering firm with an excellent reputation. These houses were built 700 feet(!) closer than the minimum distance recommended by this report! Not only are there blast zones from Silver Eagle that fall right on these houses, but many of these same houses are in the blast zone from Pioneer pipeline (also presented in the report). Every house that was damaged by this blast is right in the blast zone predicted by Redd engineering! The city council is stating that they questioned the methodology used by Redd in favor of a no-name engineering firm...well, residents, it looks like Redd was dead-on accurate here. I, for one, want answers as to how the city council threw out the Redd report in favor of the 2nd report. It's very, very fishy. I am furious about this and feel absolutely mislead. The city council has now moved into a "cover our behinds" mode because of how bad this looks. One final note...in the Redd engineering conclusions, this statement is made "If the Woods Cross City council moves forward with approval of residences being built in this blast zone, they may be liable for any damages that may result from an incident at Silver Eagle or Pioneer Pipeline." I'd be sweating bullets right now if I was the city council. The residents deserve honest answers. You can verify that every statement I have made is absolutely true by reading the report.
Sorry, we are not accepting new comments on this story.
KSL's public inspection files, including the Children's Television Programming Reports and the DTV Quarterly Activity Station Report, are available for viewing during regular office hours at the KSL Broadcast House.
1:18pm - Thu Nov 05th, 2009
8:50am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
8:53am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
While the refineries may have been there first, that doesn't give them any right to trespass upon or damage neighboring property. They should have either purchased anti-development easements over the property in harms way or purchased the property outright. They will be cutting big checks for this one. They are very lucky no-one was hurt.
9:04am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
9:06am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
There is a legal doctrine called coming to the nuisance. This is a classic example. You don't get to develop near a pig farm, then complain about the stink.
However, there is a competing theory that strict liability attaches for damages related to an abnormally dangerous activity. This industry certainly qualifies as an ADA, and thus they should be found strictly liable for the damages.
In the end, this is going to be one huge mess, most likely with many of the insurance companies paying claims then taking those subrogated rights against the refinery and the developer.
10:03am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
Second the sellers/developer should have disclosed that the housing project is in a "blast zone" I think that this is a material fact which could affect one's decision to buy in that neighborhood.
Third what greedy essohbee thought a blast zone would be a good place to put a community.
10:04am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
Coming to the nuisance is not the current state of American law. It is currently a small minority rule. See AMJUR NUISANCES § 426. Right to farm acts of course would not apply to a refinery. Also this was not a nuisance, so the basis for the coming to the nuisance defense would not fit the circumstances. Smoke, noise, and even risk levels from the refinery might be nuisances. Explosions which cause physical damage to neighboring property are not nuisances. Explosions would likely be considered akin to flooding and therefore trespass.
Either way I believe it will be a strict liability issue.
11:25am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
11:31am - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
4:04pm - Fri Nov 06th, 2009
Yes the refinery was there first, but the fact remains that Woods Cross City wanted the money. When it caught up to them, they do the stupid routine.
Now they are going to display the big bully and go after the refinery for the blame. I hope that the rest of the citizens of this great city do not buy this manure that the mayor is trying to shovel.
Go after the City. Let the Mayor give up his home to one of us who's house was damaged. He won't. He is a coward. What a joke this city is............
I hope the Refinery Sues the City and WINS!