DENVER (AP) — The gay rights movement's winning streak in same-sex marriage lawsuits faces its biggest test yet in Denver where a federal appeals court will weigh whether to give an important victory to gay couples' right to marry or halt their momentum.

A three-judge panel will hear arguments on Thursday and next week on whether they should uphold separate rulings by two federal judges that threw out same-sex marriage bans in Utah and Oklahoma.

They do so, however, in a climate far different than 2004, when voters overwhelmingly approved the prohibitions in both states.

After the U.S. Supreme Court last year ruled that a law forbidding the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages was unconstitutional, eight federal judges in all have struck down state bans on gay marriage or on the recognition of same-sex marriages from other states.

As the panel of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals considers the Utah case Thursday, experts say pressure is on the judges at a time when polls show a majority of Americans backing same-sex unions.

"The challenge for conservative judge would be: Do you want to be the only court of appeals that upholds discrimination that the country is rapidly galloping to renounce?" said William Eskridge, a law professor at Yale University, said. "The handwriting is on the wall."

Opponents say that shouldn't factor into the judges' calculations.

"There are strong political factors that seem to be driving these district court decisions," said Ed Whelan of the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., adding that expectations that the Supreme Court will ultimately find that gays have the right to marry may also feed into it.

Related:

Reyes requests stay of same-sex adoptions in Utah

The Utah Attorney General's Office is petitioning the Utah Court of Appeals to halt same-sex adoption proceedings as it appeals a federal judge's ruling that overturned the state's constitutional definition of marriage.

"It's not the job of lower courts to predict where the Supreme Court will go," he said.

Despite the legal momentum, attorneys say it is distinctly possible the 10th Circuit could rule against gay marriage backers and argue the issue is best settled at the ballot box.

"It's an institutional argument that we've seen at the Supreme Court and we've seen in state litigation," Douglas NeJaime, a law professor at the University of California-Irvine, said. "If the court wanted to not say something about the merits, but uphold the ban, they could go that direction."

The three judges picked randomly to hear the case, and next week's appeal of the ruling that struck down an Oklahoma gay marriage ban, include two Republicans and one Democrat.

One of the Republicans, Jerome A. Holmes, appointed by President George W. Bush, initially voted against staying the trial court's ruling, which allowed more than 1,000 gay couples to wed in Utah in December before the Supreme Court stepped in and stayed the initial ruling.

All eyes focused on the 10th Circuit Court

by Dennis Romboy

DENVER — Colorado same-sex marriage supporters rallied outside the federal courthouse in downtown Denver on the eve of Utah's defense of its law banning gay and lesbian unions.

Support Marriage Equality in Colorado put on the event to support the three Utah couples whose case will be heard by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday. The group says the issue matters to Coloradans because the state is part of the 10th Circuit.

"We just wanted to make sure that we showed the community and our state that we support the families. We wanted to let everyone know why marriage matters to our families," said Jeff Allen, who founded the organization.

About 250 people attended the rally on the steps of the Byron White Federal Courthouse where lawyers for the Utah couples and the state will argue before a three-judge panel Thursday.

The outcome could have implications in Colorado, which passed a state constitutional ban on same-sex marriage in 2006. It is among six states that make up the 10th Circuit along with Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Wyoming and Utah.

"This case could be the one that overturns everything nationwide," Allen said. "We felt that being in the same district, it's kind of our obligation to do this."

The Utah case is the first to reach a federal appellate court since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the Defense of Marriage Act in U.S. v. Windsor last summer. That case figures to play a prominent role in Thursday's oral arguments.

A year ago last month, Derek Kitchen and Moudi Sbeity, Laurie Wood and Kody Partridge, and Karen Archer and Kate Call challenged Utah's law against same-sex marriage in federal court.

U.S. District Judge Robert J. Shelby's ruling last December upended Utah's voter-approved Amendment 3 defining marriage as between a man and a woman. He found the law violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the 14th Amendment.

Utah appealed Shelby's decision and obtained a stay from the Supreme Court but not before about 1,300 same-sex couples were married in Utah. The 10th Circuit will decide whether to affirm or reverse his ruling.

In Windsor, the high court struck down the section of DOMA that defines marriage as between a man and a woman for purposes of federal law, ruling that the government must give the same benefits to gay married couples as it does to heterosexual married couples.

Utah contends Windsor also recognizes the state's authority to define and regulate marriage. The plaintiffs argue that any state definition of marriage must be constitutional.

Since the high court ruling on DOMA, eight federal judges, including Shelby, have struck down state bans on gay marriage or on the recognition of same-sex marriage from other states. Those states are Michigan, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennesee, Texas, Utah and Virginia.

Kentucky has filed notice that it will appeal a federal ruling that it must recognize same-sex marriages from other states, making nine state whose cases are on appeal.

Utah's case is a week ahead of one in Oklahoma, which is scheduled for oral arguments in the 10th Circuit next Thursday. The same three judges will hear both cases.

Contributing: Rich Piatt

The other two judges are Carlos F. Lucero, appointed by President Bill Clinton, and Paul J. Kelly, Jr., appointed by President George H.W. Bush.

Kenneth Upton, an attorney with the Lambda Legal Defense Fund who watches the 10th Circuit carefully, said the panel is a perfect representation of a court that is generally moderate and centrist.

"If you wanted to pick a panel where you could do a straw poll of the judiciary, this is a pretty good sample," Upton said.

It will likely be months before the panel issues a ruling, which will become law in the six states in its jurisdiction unless it is stayed. Those states are Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming. New Mexico's Supreme Court has already legalized gay marriage in that state.

Even if the panel upholds the lower court's decision, the argument will only be settled when it moves one more level up to the Supreme Court. The high court could get a case either from the 10th circuit or one of the at least four other appeals courts scheduled to consider the issue.

Still, both sides say the stakes are high on Thursday.

"Having a victory from the 10th Circuit would be electrifying," said Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, which is representing the plaintiffs in the Utah case. "It would be extremely encouraging and help continue the incredible momentum."

Jim Campbell, an attorney for Alliance Defending Freedom, which represents religious organizations, said: "The stakes are whether the people can continue to define marriage as between a man and a woman."

Lawyers for Utah and several other organizations that have filed briefs supporting the state's side argue the ban should stand because the state has a right to promote marriage between a man and a woman, which is optimal for childrearing.

The plaintiffs and gay rights proponents counter there is little data backing up the state's case on parenting and that the ban improperly deprives gay couples of the right to marriage.

The Supreme Court sounded skeptical of the childrearing argument in its ruling last year, noting that gay couples raise children who are harmed by their parents' marriages not being recognized.

Underscoring the political pressure in the case, a pro-gay marriage group began airing ads supporting same-sex weddings in Colorado, Oklahoma, Wyoming and Washington, D.C., on Tuesday.

Andrew Koppelman, a law professor at Northwestern University, said that societal change has made the final outcome inevitable.

"I don't know what's going to happen in this case, but it's clear that the same-sex marriage movement has won," Koppelman said. "Federal judges know that. You bring these cases before them, and they don't want to say 'No.'"

___

Follow Riccardi on Twitter at https://twitter.com/NickRiccardi and McCombs at https://twitter.com/BradyMcCombs .

Copyright © The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Related topics